Ballard on waivers

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 19125
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Hockey Widow »

Jovocop wrote:
Reefer2 wrote:So I am confused (like what else is new) can he or cant he be bought out now?
I believe that MG needs to put Ballard on unconditional waiver again in order to buy him out. MG is probably shopping Ballard around for a cheaper buyout option. If the option is not available, Ballard will be on the unconditional waiver tomorrow. The Canucks can proceed to buy him out after 48 hours.

Isn't the deadline for buyouts Thursday? If they put him on waivers tomorrow they won't have 48 hours to see if he clears. I wouldn't be surprised, if they need to put him back on unconditional waivers they did so today as soon as he failed to clear. That would give them the 48 hour window, no?>
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Jovocop
CC Legend
Posts: 3778
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Jovocop »

Hockey Widow wrote:
Jovocop wrote:
Reefer2 wrote:So I am confused (like what else is new) can he or cant he be bought out now?
I believe that MG needs to put Ballard on unconditional waiver again in order to buy him out. MG is probably shopping Ballard around for a cheaper buyout option. If the option is not available, Ballard will be on the unconditional waiver tomorrow. The Canucks can proceed to buy him out after 48 hours.

Isn't the deadline for buyouts Thursday? If they put him on waivers tomorrow they won't have 48 hours to see if he clears. I wouldn't be surprised, if they need to put him back on unconditional waivers they did so today as soon as he failed to clear. That would give them the 48 hour window, no?>
Good point. How could the media miss that? :|
User avatar
2Fingers
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7661
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:47 am

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by 2Fingers »

so now we cant buy him out and have $4M in cap space to sign a few players?

Hope Aqua man starts to like less sell outs each night as this team bores the hell out of everyone.

unless I am missing something important there is less than $4M cap space right?
User avatar
Southern_Canuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1497
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Southern_Canuck »

I think 48 hours was the amount of time after the final game of the playoffs that teams had to wait to begin compliance buyouts - and unconditional waivers for purposes of compliance buyout are still just 24 hours. I guess we will see if Ballard is put on unconditional waivers tomorrow.

Obviously I was anti-Ballard trade from the beginning, and won't be sorry to see him go.

A lot of people somehow have the impression that he was "mishandled" by AV and Bowness which I find mystifying. Ballard just wasn't a defender that they trusted, so they put the players they trust on the ice. When you look at his play, he just didn't cut the mustard at either end of the ice - especially for $4.2M.

Strengths:
Skating
Shot-blocking
Mucked pretty well in puck battles for a small guy

Weaknesses:
Riverboat gambler often getting caught up ice or out of position trying to make a hit (hip check)
Weak point shot rarely got through
Poor passing vision especially when he did rush the puck into the opposing zone, he usually ended up swooping behind opposing net and eventually turning over the puck without being able to make a play

My NHL comparison was Mike Weaver, but Ballard was paid like a top 30 in the NHL guy. If he had been making only $1.5M, and the Canucks didn't give up a 1st round pick for him, it wouldn't have been so bad to have a mediocre #5-6 defender. But that's not how it was.

S_C
It's a great day for hockey!
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 42804
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Strangelove »

Hockey Widow wrote: I wouldn't be surprised, if they need to put him back on unconditional waivers they did so today as soon as he failed to clear.
That's what I've been assuming (wasn't Gillis quoted as saying they would buy KB4 out if not claimed).

As I said the other day, 48hr waivers IS required for "compliance buyouts".

The only other thing I can think of is they do a regular buyout ($1.4mil times 4 years) to save a compliance buyout.

But yeah that seems crazy so...
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 42804
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Strangelove »

sagebrush wrote: But...
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie says
VAN's Keith Ballard is on conventional waivers. Not $100 unconditional waivers, which is necessary for buyout purposes.
This was discussed in this forum the other day...
____
Try to focus on someday.
dbr
CC Legend
Posts: 3093
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by dbr »

herb wrote:We'll see what Ballard gets offered when he's a UFA. I bet he'll get paid less than Aaron Rome.
In fairness, I think the lesser buyouts are going to have even greater deflationary pressure on their subsequent contracts than other fringe players will with the cap going down - the salary on their next deal may not be a reflection of teams views of their ability.

Obviously Vinny got himself top six money again and so will Daniel Briere, but guys like Ballard and Komisarek and Shultz will be pressed to take ~$1m deals even if teams think they can be worth more - they'll be getting paid by their former teams and they'll be in a spot where they need to prove they can still play in this league.

I could see Ballard having a role as large as or larger than what Aaron Rome had in Dallas this past year, and while that should not be a feather in his cap it would be more of an indicator of his ability than a one year $800 000 contract would be.
Southern_Canuck wrote:I think 48 hours was the amount of time after the final game of the playoffs that teams had to wait to begin compliance buyouts - and unconditional waivers for purposes of compliance buyout are still just 24 hours. I guess we will see if Ballard is put on unconditional waivers tomorrow.
I haven't seen anything specifically for compliance buyouts, but what I have seen for unconditional waivers is that it's a 48 hour period. Which if true means Ballard must have been waived yesterday (if he's going to get a compliance buy out).
A lot of people somehow have the impression that he was "mishandled" by AV and Bowness which I find mystifying. Ballard just wasn't a defender that they trusted, so they put the players they trust on the ice. When you look at his play, he just didn't cut the mustard at either end of the ice - especially for $4.2M.
Ballard has pretty clearly been a better player than he was in Vancouver, whether he ever finds that again I don't know but early on it was tempting to look for other explanations than "his game just fell off a cliff" because it usually doesn't happen for guys under 30 unless there's some major injury or something along those lines.

But it appears that's what did happen for KB4, I think he was misused in the first season but as time wore on that simply ceased to explain his poor play - ultimately its on a player to persevere and do everything they can to be effective in the role they've been asked to play, and Ballard didn't do that. I don't think he was a great fit here but it's not like the coaching staff asked him to learn to play right a right-handed stick or anything.

Anyway hopefully its onwards and upwards for Ballard but no way would it be worth taking a chance on him at $8.4m over two years.
My NHL comparison was Mike Weaver, but Ballard was paid like a top 30 in the NHL guy. If he had been making only $1.5M, and the Canucks didn't give up a 1st round pick for him, it wouldn't have been so bad to have a mediocre #5-6 defender. But that's not how it was.

S_C
Weaver is actually really effective in his own zone (tremendously effective, given his size) so I don't really agree with the comparison.
User avatar
tantalum
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:41 am
Location: Carl Junction, MO

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by tantalum »

Ballard will be put on unconditional waivers today per Bobby Mac and Ballard's agent Ben Harkinson.

That will put the canucks with $7.5 mil in cap space with 16 players signed (9F, 5D, 2G).

Tack on the 10% summer allowance and Gillis has some room to work with on Friday.
dbr
CC Legend
Posts: 3093
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by dbr »

tantalum wrote:Ballard will be put on unconditional waivers today per Bobby Mac and Ballard's agent Ben Harkinson.

That will put the canucks with $7.5 mil in cap space with 16 players signed (9F, 5D, 2G).

Tack on the 10% summer allowance and Gillis has some room to work with on Friday.
Should be interesting. Almost $14m in wiggle room, although obviously using that in its entirety would be problematic.

Still, I am holding out some hope that the team is going to build its roster with the same plan it had in 2010-11 - build the best team you can in the offseason, and hold onto everyone for as long as possible.

My guess is, now that there are no recall waivers the team will try to sneak a few guys who will be on the team down to Utica at the end of camp, and use the performance bonus exemptions on players like Gaunce and Horvat to stay under the cap on the opening day roster.

Still, if you pencil in guys like Lain/Schroeder/Weise and 10% over their QOs and Tanev at 100% over his, that only leaves about $3m of room with three roster spots open; it will take some wizardry to add a legitimate top nine forward under the circumstances and I won't be holding my breath.
User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by herb »

tantalum wrote:Ballard will be put on unconditional waivers today per Bobby Mac and Ballard's agent Ben Harkinson.

That will put the canucks with $7.5 mil in cap space with 16 players signed (9F, 5D, 2G).

Tack on the 10% summer allowance and Gillis has some room to work with on Friday.
Ballard now has been put on unconditional waivers for compliance buyout purposes.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 42804
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Strangelove »

herb wrote: Ballard now has been put on unconditional waivers for compliance buyout purposes.
Yup yup yup yup yup....

Ballard will do fine on a team that doesn't play a system and lets him do whatever the hell he wants. :roll:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by herb »

Strangelove wrote: Yup yup yup yup yup....

Ballard will do fine on a team that doesn't play a system and lets him do whatever the hell he wants. :roll:
Totally! Poor Keith just needs somebody to give him a chance!
User avatar
Cornuck
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 14943
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Everywhere

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Cornuck »

See ya later Keith. Thanks for the few memorable hip checks, and good luck where ever you end up.

Doc: "BTW, Donny was right, you're smug."
User avatar
Todd Bersnoozi
CC Legend
Posts: 3723
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Todd Bersnoozi »

It's official, Ballard signs with Minny. Guess it's my last chance to call him Baltard. :lol:
User avatar
Tciso
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Ballard on waivers

Post by Tciso »

Todd Bersnoozi wrote:It's official, Ballard signs with Minny. Guess it's my last chance to call him Baltard. :lol:
I always liked Ballard, but since he's gone, I'll get one or two quick jabs in.

Nah, you'll get at least 3 times a season to call him Baltard from the cheap seats.
Ballard, I hope that the 6 games that you show up to play this season are not all against the Canucks.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
Post Reply