Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Re: CHI v. LA and BOS v. PIT (and Van v. ...Beuller...anybod
Rumsfeld wrote:
Strangelove wrote:I fell in love with the Bruins when they eliminated the Leaves.
Plus they're exactly the kind of team I've been pushing for the Canucks to build for years.
"Oh no Strangelove, the game has changed, they're gonna call everything in the playoffs now!"
Do you really think the league would let the Canucks play like the Bruins?
We tried to play clean physical hockey against the Sharks and wound up on the shit end of the worst PP differential in NHL history.
It doesn't matter how we play, we seem to never get more PPs than our opponent in any series. Especially when the score is close.
Call it whining, call it whatever the fuck you want. You'd have to be fucking stupid to not see that the playing field is totally tipped against certain teams and it has nothing to do with their "reputation" or the players on their roster.
Get rid of the greedy jew who overexpanded his cash-strapped league and sees dollar signs when big market teams make the playoffs. Until then there's no fucking point in even considering becoming the big bad Bruins of the West.
They don't let your Vancouver Canucks win your Stanley Cup because your Vancouver Canucks are whiny wimps.
Strangelove wrote:
They don't let your Vancouver Canucks win your Stanley Cup because your Vancouver Canucks are whiny wimps.
THINK ABOUT IT
I thought ABOUT IT
Being whiny wimps sure doesn't seem to affect Chicago's wonderful relationship with the league and its minions.
I think Chicago gets a way with it cause its Chicago. We don't because Vancouver could slide into the sea and nobody would notice...especially in New York where the league office is...
Rumsfeld wrote:
Tell that to tant, he thinks Henrik is a bastion of toughness and playoff awesomeness.
Most guys have a hard time accepting the fact their team is the whiniest group of wimps in the history of hockey.
Don't be one of them Rummy.
OK fine, we're whiny wimps, that's something I've been trying to knock into a midwestern mongoloid's head for some time now... It definitely hasn't helped our relationship with the, ahem, officials.
But do you really think that's the main reason we've gotten the shit end of the stick for so long? Remember game 7 against the Rangers? That team was tough as a motherfucker. Seriously, we had several players who would have fucked their own mothers to win that game!
I remember you saying the Canucks would never win a Stanley Cup... you must have some inkling of that to which I refer.
Rumsfeld wrote:
But do you really think that's the main reason we've gotten the shit end of the stick for so long? Remember game 7 against the Rangers? That team was tough as a motherfucker. Seriously, we had several players who would have fucked their own mothers to win that game!
That was the closest your Vancouver Canucks ever got to your Stanley Cup.
That squad was almost tough enough.
Yours truly has consistently called for more toughness every off-season for the better part of two decades.