Well the purpose of my post wasn't to post the video but rather to show Reefer how to embed images.Arachnid wrote: why didn't you just link to my post then Mr. Arseson18
....or was it to steal credit and get HW to like me better??
Moderator: Referees
Well the purpose of my post wasn't to post the video but rather to show Reefer how to embed images.Arachnid wrote: why didn't you just link to my post then Mr. Arseson18
Don't you have a train to catch?Aaronp18 wrote:Well the purpose of my post wasn't to post the video but rather to show Reefer how to embed images.Arachnid wrote: why didn't you just link to my post then Mr. Arseson18
....or was it to steal credit and get HW to like me better??
Arachnid wrote:I already posted that in the trade threadHockey Widow wrote:That was so cool. I like that they taped that.
AirHead81 is slow and frigid
Aaronp18 wrote:Well the purpose of my post wasn't to post the video but rather to show Reefer how to embed images.Arachnid wrote: why didn't you just link to my post then Mr. Arseson18
....or was it to steal credit and get HW to like me better??
Southern_Canuck wrote:I can sum up my opinion of the Roy trade as follows:
Better than doing nothing.
S_C
In his first game, he consistently tried to create opportunities off of the rush, in fact even tried to force passes when he would have been better off to cycle... I wonder if that's his style? Very opposite of the Sedins. I guess we'll see.Hockey Widow wrote:I'm one of those that see Brendan Morrison when I see Roy. Mind you it has only been one game.
I think this is EXACTLY what the Canucks need. Too much cycle. Start forcing opponents to guess wether we attack the net off the rush, instead of constantly skating down the wall or doing the chip/chase.Southern_Canuck wrote:In his first game, he consistently tried to create opportunities off of the rush, in fact even tried to force passes when he would have been better off to cycle... I wonder if that's his style? Very opposite of the Sedins. I guess we'll see.Hockey Widow wrote:I'm one of those that see Brendan Morrison when I see Roy. Mind you it has only been one game.
S_C
Personally, I think we should put Raymond back with Kesler once both are healthy, there was once a time when Kesler and Raymond had great chemistry and I think that could spark again with Raymond playing good hockey again. Kesler, Booth and Raymond may actually work cause Raymond is a heads up play making winger and might be the catalyst to gel'ing Kesler with Booth as the lines distributor. That is, if Booth ever gets healthyIsland Nucklehead wrote:
I'm thinking a line like Booth-Roy-Raymond could score some great goals using speed off the rush (Booth crashing the net, of course).
RoyalDude wrote:Personally, I think we should put Raymond back with Kesler once both are healthy, there was once a time when Kesler and Raymond had great chemistry and I think that could spark again with Raymond playing good hockey again.Island Nucklehead wrote:
I'm thinking a line like Booth-Roy-Raymond could score some great goals using speed off the rush (Booth crashing the net, of course).
RoyalDude wrote:Kesler, Booth and Raymond may actually work cause Raymond is a heads up play making winger and might be the catalyst to gel'ing Kesler with Booth as the lines distributor. That is, if Booth ever gets healthy
Yup.RoyalDude wrote:I like the line of Higgins, Roy and Hansen
Put Burr back with the Hank and Dank.
Put Kassian with Weise and Lappiere for the playoffs as your crash and bang line.
park Sestito and Pinner in the box
Morrison was more of a passenger on the WCE line. Whenever Bert or Naslund missed a game the line suffered. Roy has better hands, is a bit quicker, passes better, and I think has a better shot. I see Roy being a guy that instantly makes Higgins, Hansen, Raymond and Kassian, better players and threats to score. Morrison wasn't that kind of player.Hockey Widow wrote:Southern_Canuck wrote:I can sum up my opinion of the Roy trade as follows:
Better than doing nothing.
S_C
I'm one of those that see Brendan Morrison when I see Roy. Mind you it has only been one game.
I beg to differ. At their peak, the WCE was the best scoring line in the NHL. Now, during the 04/05 lockout, Brendan just happened to be on the best scoring line in the SEL, alongside Mike Knuble and Christian Huselius. Mind you, Näslund, the Sedins, Zetterberg, Hossa, Forsberg... There were a lot of good players there, but once again Morrison just happens to be on the best scoring line of the league.Mëds wrote:Morrison was more of a passenger on the WCE line. Whenever Bert or Naslund missed a game the line suffered. Roy has better hands, is a bit quicker, passes better, and I think has a better shot. I see Roy being a guy that instantly makes Higgins, Hansen, Raymond and Kassian, better players and threats to score. Morrison wasn't that kind of player.Hockey Widow wrote:Southern_Canuck wrote:I can sum up my opinion of the Roy trade as follows:
Better than doing nothing.
S_C
I'm one of those that see Brendan Morrison when I see Roy. Mind you it has only been one game.
He's from Ottawa...no chance he wants to tickle the blowhole. I'd bet the SensAaronp18 wrote:Watched a bit of Afterhours las night and I definitely got the impression that he won't be signing an extension with the Canucks.
His family in Ottawa seemed like a really big factor so I'd imagine he signs back there. The Laughs is what I figure.