BC>NY>BC......happy?Hockey Widow wrote:rats19 wrote:Leaving BC for BC...
Leaving BC for NY.
Canucks News and Notes
Moderator: Referees
Re: Canucks News and Notes
Getting old is not for the young...
Re: Canucks News and Notes
New Demko thread: http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... =2&t=10923
2021 - Playoff Bound
Re: Canucks News and Notes
Move all my good shit there then...Cornuck wrote:New Demko thread: http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... =2&t=10923

Getting old is not for the young...
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16164
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Canucks News and Notes
rats19 wrote:BC>NY>BC......happy?Hockey Widow wrote:rats19 wrote:Leaving BC for BC...
Leaving BC for NY.
Always!!

The only HW the Canucks need
Re: Canucks News and Notes
Just did.rats19 wrote:Move all my good shit there then...Cornuck wrote:New Demko thread: http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... =2&t=10923

2021 - Playoff Bound
Re: Canucks News and Notes
The simple act of doing so.....acknowledges I actually had some good shit......maybe I should check firstCornuck wrote:Just did.rats19 wrote:Move all my good shit there then...Cornuck wrote:New Demko thread: http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... =2&t=10923

I thought I smelled a rat.....
Getting old is not for the young...
Re: Canucks News and Notes
Because of BG (Benning Genius)rats19 wrote:BC>NY>BC......happy?Hockey Widow wrote:rats19 wrote:Leaving BC for BC...
Leaving BC for NY.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
- Doyle Hargraves
- MVP
- Posts: 20726
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Canucks News and Notes
Little too soon to be doing cartwheels about the 2014 draft considering the three players Elmer shoehorned into the roster wouldn't have gotten a sniff with a top 20 team.That said it is looking a little bit promising. Emphasize little however.Hockey Widow wrote:Ryan Biech
14m14 minutes ago
Ryan Biech @ryanbiech
Can confirm that Thatcher Demko has now officially signed his entry level deal with the #Canucks
Biech confirming the signing but nothing official from Canucks or NHL. Just a matter of time now.
Interesting discussion starting on a few sites now. Should the Canucks trade Markstrom while his value is high, go with Miller/Cannata until Demko is ready?
If you want the rebuild to keep progressing with us missing the playoffs again why not? But is Markstrom's value really that high.
If I'm Benning, which we all know I'm not, I'm looking to extend Markstrom ASAP, 4-5 year deal. But the trade talk will heat up.
The Canucks 2014 NHL draft, Thatcher Demko, Jake Virtanen, Jared McCann and Nikita Tryamkin. Not too shabby for one draft year.
“Gohmert and Bumpty sitting in a tree”
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16164
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Canucks News and Notes
Agreed Blob. It's just been so long since there has been a draft to have excitement over.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Little too soon to be doing cartwheels about the 2014 draft considering the three players Elmer shoehorned into the roster wouldn't have gotten a sniff with a top 20 team.That said it is looking a little bit promising. Emphasize little however.Hockey Widow wrote:Ryan Biech
14m14 minutes ago
Ryan Biech @ryanbiech
Can confirm that Thatcher Demko has now officially signed his entry level deal with the #Canucks
Biech confirming the signing but nothing official from Canucks or NHL. Just a matter of time now.
Interesting discussion starting on a few sites now. Should the Canucks trade Markstrom while his value is high, go with Miller/Cannata until Demko is ready?
If you want the rebuild to keep progressing with us missing the playoffs again why not? But is Markstrom's value really that high.
If I'm Benning, which we all know I'm not, I'm looking to extend Markstrom ASAP, 4-5 year deal. But the trade talk will heat up.
The Canucks 2014 NHL draft, Thatcher Demko, Jake Virtanen, Jared McCann and Nikita Tryamkin. Not too shabby for one draft year.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: Canucks News and Notes
A little negative, Blobby? When was the last time we had a draft that even had 3 of the players -ever- play an NHL game??? And, Demko is as close to a sure thing as you can get. 2014 was our strongest draft year since the Sedins.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Little too soon to be doing cartwheels about the 2014 draft considering the three players Elmer shoehorned into the roster wouldn't have gotten a sniff with a top 20 team.That said it is looking a little bit promising. Emphasize little however.Hockey Widow wrote:Ryan Biech
14m14 minutes ago
Ryan Biech @ryanbiech
Can confirm that Thatcher Demko has now officially signed his entry level deal with the #Canucks
Biech confirming the signing but nothing official from Canucks or NHL. Just a matter of time now.
Interesting discussion starting on a few sites now. Should the Canucks trade Markstrom while his value is high, go with Miller/Cannata until Demko is ready?
If you want the rebuild to keep progressing with us missing the playoffs again why not? But is Markstrom's value really that high.
If I'm Benning, which we all know I'm not, I'm looking to extend Markstrom ASAP, 4-5 year deal. But the trade talk will heat up.
The Canucks 2014 NHL draft, Thatcher Demko, Jake Virtanen, Jared McCann and Nikita Tryamkin. Not too shabby for one draft year.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
Re: Canucks News and Notes
2004 was another strong draft year for the Canucks with Schneider (26th), Edler (91st), Brown (159th) and Hansen (287th). Two of the them are still with the Canucks. Schneider was traded for 9th overall pick which was used to select Horvat. Sadly, it might be one of the best drafts in the Canucks history.Tciso wrote:A little negative, Blobby? When was the last time we had a draft that even had 3 of the players -ever- play an NHL game??? And, Demko is as close to a sure thing as you can get. 2014 was our strongest draft year since the Sedins.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Little too soon to be doing cartwheels about the 2014 draft considering the three players Elmer shoehorned into the roster wouldn't have gotten a sniff with a top 20 team.That said it is looking a little bit promising. Emphasize little however.Hockey Widow wrote:Ryan Biech
14m14 minutes ago
Ryan Biech @ryanbiech
Can confirm that Thatcher Demko has now officially signed his entry level deal with the #Canucks
Biech confirming the signing but nothing official from Canucks or NHL. Just a matter of time now.
Interesting discussion starting on a few sites now. Should the Canucks trade Markstrom while his value is high, go with Miller/Cannata until Demko is ready?
If you want the rebuild to keep progressing with us missing the playoffs again why not? But is Markstrom's value really that high.
If I'm Benning, which we all know I'm not, I'm looking to extend Markstrom ASAP, 4-5 year deal. But the trade talk will heat up.
The Canucks 2014 NHL draft, Thatcher Demko, Jake Virtanen, Jared McCann and Nikita Tryamkin. Not too shabby for one draft year.

- BurningBeard
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:02 pm
Re: Canucks News and Notes
2011 - but considering the players we're talking about are Jensen, Grenier, and Corrado it's not saying much. You have to go back to 2005 after that...Tciso wrote:A little negative, Blobby? When was the last time we had a draft that even had 3 of the players -ever- play an NHL game???
Every time I look out my window, same three dogs looking back at me.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28337
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Canucks News and Notes
I posted this in the Round One thread.Strangelove wrote: But what if the Panthers were to buy out Lou's contract in 2018:
http://www.generalfanager.com/buyouts/9 ... &year=2018
Look at the big reach-the-floor cap-hits they'd get at only $583,333 real dollars (times 8 years)
Might be the best option for them at that point in time, given a declining Lou.
(if Lou retires in 2018, Cats would get a Cap Recapture "penalty" of $1,235,254, times 4 seasons).
To spell it out, what I'm theorizing in the post above is:
There would be no Cap Recapture penalties on Luongo's contract if the Panthers bought out the contract.
We know that "Compliance Buyouts" wiped out Recap penalties... wouldn't regular buyouts do the same?
Perhaps not, but it makes perfect sense to me.
I've been looking around and I can't find a definite answer.
If anyone has a link that definitively shows this wouldn't work, please, help a guy out.
Yes, I've looked at the Mike Richards case, yes LA is paying Recap, but circumstances were entirely different.
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!
GO CANUCKS GO!!!
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16164
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Canucks News and Notes
But if the buy Lou out aren't we on for 20%? Still would be a lot easier to take $100,000+ over 8 years I guess. It actually would make the Panthers salary and cap smaller too.
The only HW the Canucks need
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16164
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Canucks News and Notes
Hey Doc, Article 50-50.5 in the CBA deals with this and gives examples. Example one shows what the buy out would be plus the savings the club recievd in the difference between salary and average cap. Interestingly, if the cap was higher than the salary, say the salary increases years 3-5 of the contract, then it shows the new cap after the buy out is likewise reduce to reflect that.
So the short answer is yes, if bought out then the CRP applies. I just can't figure it out for multiple years and varying amounts. They give simplistic examples. But the answer appears to be yes there will be capture recapture hell short of LTIR or death. Seriously, death voids the contract!!
So if Luongo for any reason other than those two fails to play out his contract we will be hit hard. The CBA deals with cap overage by saying the league has 30 days upon realizing there is overage to notify the team. The team has 30 days to take corrective measures but I'm unclear what the penalties are for failure to correct. It talks about this in terms of voiding a new contract or a trade that creates the overage but doesn't specifically deal with this situation. For sure they would reject any new contracts or trades until it was corrected.
When Calgary was perilously close to not being able to ice the minimum number of players the rules called for a default of the game. I'm not sure if that would happen here. Default all games until compliance? Loss of draft picks? Heavy fines? All of the above?
The one saving grace is that if a player retires mid season, defined as after the completion of the team's first game, any cap penalty or CRP is deferred until the start of the next season. If the retirement happens to be his last contract year then there is no penalty.
So the short answer is yes, if bought out then the CRP applies. I just can't figure it out for multiple years and varying amounts. They give simplistic examples. But the answer appears to be yes there will be capture recapture hell short of LTIR or death. Seriously, death voids the contract!!
So if Luongo for any reason other than those two fails to play out his contract we will be hit hard. The CBA deals with cap overage by saying the league has 30 days upon realizing there is overage to notify the team. The team has 30 days to take corrective measures but I'm unclear what the penalties are for failure to correct. It talks about this in terms of voiding a new contract or a trade that creates the overage but doesn't specifically deal with this situation. For sure they would reject any new contracts or trades until it was corrected.
When Calgary was perilously close to not being able to ice the minimum number of players the rules called for a default of the game. I'm not sure if that would happen here. Default all games until compliance? Loss of draft picks? Heavy fines? All of the above?
The one saving grace is that if a player retires mid season, defined as after the completion of the team's first game, any cap penalty or CRP is deferred until the start of the next season. If the retirement happens to be his last contract year then there is no penalty.
The only HW the Canucks need