Hmmmm still not sure if that's proper etiquette big guy.Mëds wrote: I meant with a paintball gun
Why don't you take a seat and tell me how long have you been having these fantasies about shooting UK with your...
... "paintball gun".
Moderator: Referees
Hmmmm still not sure if that's proper etiquette big guy.Mëds wrote: I meant with a paintball gun
"You're fired!"Cornuck wrote:Ok - it's time to vent.
Imagine you're in a room with Bettman and Fehr. It's locked and you have 5 minutes to say what's on your mind.
Aaronp18 wrote:"You're fired!"Cornuck wrote:Ok - it's time to vent.
Imagine you're in a room with Bettman and Fehr. It's locked and you have 5 minutes to say what's on your mind.
And.......
"you're fired!"
And we all live happily ever after.
:thumbs
*i know this solves nothing as if you get rid of the two of them it's more than likely that another two asshats will just take their place.
Blob and UK? Are you kidding.....You're just sticking a rational fellow in there with a junior version of Fehr.okcanuck wrote:Aaronp18 wrote:"You're fired!"Cornuck wrote:Ok - it's time to vent.
Imagine you're in a room with Bettman and Fehr. It's locked and you have 5 minutes to say what's on your mind.
And.......
"you're fired!"
And we all live happily ever after.
:thumbs
*i know this solves nothing as if you get rid of the two of them it's more than likely that another two asshats will just take their place.
Thats perfect .Fire both Bettman and Feur, install Ukcanuck and Blob in their place,give them a 24 and we'd have an agreement in 3 hours or when the beer was gone.
Depends on if I got bettmans job or Fehr's. if I'm the commish I'd move the three lowest revenue dogs to Quebec City , southern Ontario, and Seattle, impose a full revenue sharing system that spread all revenues and costs and risks equally, imposed linked caps on both ends of the spectrum that guaranteed competitive equality across the league and guaranteed contracts with full pensions and insurance for all.Mëds wrote: Blob and UK? Are you kidding.....You're just sticking a rational fellow in there with a junior version of Fehr.
"Dance with the devil and he will shoot you with his paintball gun".ukcanuck wrote: If I'm Fehr I'd do exactly as he's doing cause you don't dance with the devil and walk away with your shorts
Strangelove wrote:"Dance with the devil and he will shoot you with his paintball gun".ukcanuck wrote: If I'm Fehr I'd do exactly as he's doing cause you don't dance with the devil and walk away with your shorts
I hate the revenue sharing thing.....but in a qualified way.ukcanuck wrote:Depends on if I got bettmans job or Fehr's. if I'm the commish I'd move the three lowest revenue dogs to Quebec City , southern Ontario, and Seattle, impose a full revenue sharing system that spread all revenues and costs and risks equally, imposed linked caps on both ends of the spectrum that guaranteed competitive equality across the league and guaranteed contracts with full pensions and insurance for all.Mëds wrote: Blob and UK? Are you kidding.....You're just sticking a rational fellow in there with a junior version of Fehr.
But then is have more than just You gunning for me, I'd probably last as long as a Lincoln in a ford theatre or a ford five miles after the warranty expired
If I'm Fehr I'd do exactly as he's doing cause you don't dance with the devil and walk away with your shorts
Like on a treadmill or eliptical?Strangelove wrote:I'd exorcise their demons.
Mëds wrote:FUCKING NHL and its players!
.....better Corn?
Mëds wrote:First I would probably stand ukcanuck up in front of Fehr and shoot him.....give Fehr the chance to see what should happen to union types that are outside of reality and forget about the bigger picture. Ok, blind socialists in general. But I digress. All I'm saying is that I'd give Fehr one last chance to get his act together.
If he didn't figure it out after that, then I'd shoot Fehr in the head. Why? Because he's not trying to do anything to help or grow the game of hockey. It's just dollar signs in his own pocket and the pockets of the players. He's as much, if not more, in a pissing match that he feels he needs to win to save face as he is than he is at a negotiation table trying to do what is best for both sides and the game itself.
I'd shoot Bettman in both knees. Why? Because even though it is always about the money with Butthead at least he links that to growing the sport and doing whatever he can to make it more popular, so it may be all about the revenues for him, but at least he's motivated to head in the right direction.....to some extent. I would also remind him that he's really short.
I would then probably regret my first action as we would all have to miss out on any further back-and-forths between uk and the likes of Pot, Coco, Blob, and pretty much anyone else who he has tried to argue with. I gotta say, the mopping up job people are doing with him is akin to some of the work that was done with hjuemani back on the old site. All rather entertaining. I'm OK with losing a form of entertainment though if it were to get hockey back and going under a "reasonable" CBA.
Jumping Jehoshaphat, another bloodthirsty ganja fan?!?the Dogsalmon wrote:Mëds wrote:First I would probably stand ukcanuck up in front of Fehr and shoot him.....give Fehr the chance to see what should happen to union types that are outside of reality and forget about the bigger picture. Ok, blind socialists in general. But I digress. All I'm saying is that I'd give Fehr one last chance to get his act together.
If he didn't figure it out after that, then I'd shoot Fehr in the head. Why? Because he's not trying to do anything to help or grow the game of hockey. It's just dollar signs in his own pocket and the pockets of the players. He's as much, if not more, in a pissing match that he feels he needs to win to save face as he is than he is at a negotiation table trying to do what is best for both sides and the game itself.
I'd shoot Bettman in both knees. Why? Because even though it is always about the money with Butthead at least he links that to growing the sport and doing whatever he can to make it more popular, so it may be all about the revenues for him, but at least he's motivated to head in the right direction.....to some extent. I would also remind him that he's really short.
I would then probably regret my first action as we would all have to miss out on any further back-and-forths between uk and the likes of Pot, Coco, Blob, and pretty much anyone else who he has tried to argue with. I gotta say, the mopping up job people are doing with him is akin to some of the work that was done with hjuemani back on the old site. All rather entertaining. I'm OK with losing a form of entertainment though if it were to get hockey back and going under a "reasonable" CBA.
i would want a nice, colour framed photo of the above bloodbath....and would put it right beside the Paul Henderson Team Canada goal and put the title..."the 2nd greatest moment in hockey history" on the fucking frame
bettman is a little prick...
fehr would eat his moms box for a nickel and sell the pictures for a dime...