The mildly ridiculous trade proposals thread

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Re: The mildly ridiculous trade proposals thread

Postby Uncle dans leg on Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:58 pm

well this is The mildly ridiculous trade proposals thread

It is to be expected
Daniel Plainview: You're not my son. You're just a little piece of competition. Bastard from a basket, bastard from a basket. You're a bastard from a basket!
User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1245
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: Lake Cowichan, BC

Re: The mildly ridiculous trade proposals thread

Postby CFP! on Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:28 am

Does SoB play the right side? Healthy scratch most night in Colorado....

:devil:
CFP!
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:22 pm

Re: The mildly ridiculous trade proposals thread

Postby Jovocop on Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:29 am

CFP! wrote:Does SoB play the right side? Healthy scratch most night in Colorado....

:devil:


I am sure that Roxy would love SoB back. :lol:
User avatar
Jovocop
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: The mildly ridiculous trade proposals thread

Postby SKYO on Mon May 13, 2013 6:41 pm

RoyalDude wrote:
SKYO wrote:Ballard + Higgins for Brassard + Savard?

Brassard seems to be on his way out of Columbus, seen that somewhere on HF the other day.

--
If we only had cap space we could probably trade for center Matt Cullen a perfect rental this season, he seems to put up some good points and thrive in the playoffs.


No offense SKYO, but you have the worst trade suggestions ever.


Hurt my feelings man :P , so I had to re-hash this ridiculous thread.

In these 2013 playoffs

Cullen - 5 gms - 3 assists. (not traded, but still)

Brassard - 7 gms - 2 goals 6 assists - 8 points (playing like a bastard!)

Unrelated comparison rental we got.
Derek Roy - 4 gms - 1 assist.
User avatar
SKYO
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1189
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: The mildly ridiculous trade proposals thread

Postby Knucklehead on Mon May 13, 2013 9:42 pm

Here's a really wild one:

To Pittsburg:

Loungo
Kessler
Booth
Bieksa
Tannev
Ballard

Vancouver

Malkin
Letang
Fluery
2nd 2013

Loungu > Fluery
Malkin > Kesler & Booth
Letang & 2nd 2013 <= Bieksa, Tanev and Ballard

Canucks flip Fluery to a team that needs a suspect 1A goaltender that could thrive with a better defensive system in front of him. Probably could get a decent #3 or 4 right side defenceman or good prospect/draft pick for him.

Why would Pittsburg do this?

They need a top goalie.
Booth might fit well with Crosby.
Kesler is a downgrade from Malkin but Booth might nearly makes up the difference.
Losing Letang is a big loss but adding Bieksa, Tanev and ballard make their D stronger overall.

I think this would make
Pittsburg a stronger overall team, especially on defence and goaltending.

Why would Vancouver do this?

Too have a one two punch of Sedin and Malkin at centre would be unreal!
Fluery could be traded for a decent #3 or #4 right side defenceman.

Line up:

Sedin Sedin Kassian/Burrows
Higgins Malkin Burrows/Kassian
Jensen/Raymond schroeder Hansen
Plug/Jensen Lappiere Weise
Call ups/plugs

Edler Letang
Hamhuois Garrison
Fluery trade/FA Coraddo
Alberts plug/plug
snail
.
.
.
.
Barker
.
Vandermeir

Schneider
Lack/ Veteran FA Backup

I think this makes Pittsburg stronger overall and weakens Vancouver in the bottom 6 and defence but it gives us two potentinatly dominant top lines.

It would depend what we could get for Fluery.
Knucklehead
CC Veteran
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:39 am

Previous

Return to Canucks Corner Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Boston Canucker, ESQ, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 10 guests