Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby SKYO on Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:07 pm

Regarding Ballard I'm hoping another insightful GM will recognize AV is literally destroying Ballard's career, as he needs a change scenery.

This is of course changes if Edler is swapped for Weber. ;)
User avatar
SKYO
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1199
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby Fred on Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:11 pm

Remember Garrison partnered Brian Campbell last season so don't expect the same sort of number's in Vcr, Before Campbell arrived he was 5+13 in 73 games and a minus 2. I believe however he can play both sides which is good. I suspect Florida isn't going to re=sign him because they know what he's asking and understand the reason for his inflated stats last season. I'll be interest when he sign with who ever how much he signs for...good luck to the guy
cheers
Fred
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:00 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby dbr on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:37 am

Hey so, the NHL is looking at forcing New Jersey Devils owner Jeff Vanderbeek out of the picture if he can't make that colossal loan payment (more than double the Devils reporting playoff revenues this spring) in time - so if he doesn't come up with it the Devils will be looking at an ownership change or at bankruptcy.

Gotta wonder what the Parise camp thinks of this.
dbr
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby dbr on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:40 am

Fred wrote:Remember Garrison partnered Brian Campbell last season so don't expect the same sort of number's in Vcr, Before Campbell arrived he was 5+13 in 73 games and a minus 2. I believe however he can play both sides which is good. I suspect Florida isn't going to re=sign him because they know what he's asking and understand the reason for his inflated stats last season. I'll be interest when he sign with who ever how much he signs for...good luck to the guy


Those who watch the Panthers say that Garrison has had a couple of good years now playing solid defensive hockey in tough minutes.. the numbers seem to back it up.

Even if the offensive production is more due to Campbell than to Garrison, he has a track record of steady, dependable play. That's something we could use - a dynamic offensive threat would be nice but given we had 3 of the top 30 defenders in scoring and more points from the D than the year previous, another calming presence on the blueline is probably of more use.
dbr
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby Tciso on Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:17 am

dbr wrote:Hey so, the NHL is looking at forcing New Jersey Devils owner Jeff Vanderbeek out of the picture if he can't make that colossal loan payment (more than double the Devils reporting playoff revenues this spring) in time - so if he doesn't come up with it the Devils will be looking at an ownership change or at bankruptcy.

Gotta wonder what the Parise camp thinks of this.


His camp is thinking that the league will pick up the tab, the same as they did for Phoenix. Carry on.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
User avatar
Tciso
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby BladesofSteel on Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:07 am

Jackman re-ups with St. Louis for another 3 years at $9.5 while the Sharks are expected to announce Brad Stuarts deal for 3 years as well. No figures yet.
The grass is always greener
BladesofSteel
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:29 pm
Location: Lower left-hand corner

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby Jovocop on Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:38 am

BladesofSteel wrote:Jackman re-ups with St. Louis for another 3 years at $9.5 while the Sharks are expected to announce Brad Stuarts deal for 3 years as well. No figures yet.


Too bad, Jackman is one of the defensemen that the Canucks could use, especially the contract seems very reasonable.
User avatar
Jovocop
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1066
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby JonT21 on Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:29 pm

I heard Jagr is testing free agency.

what do you guys think about this, should we try to sign him?
User avatar
JonT21
CC Rookie
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:24 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby wienerdog on Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:31 pm

1040 also reporting that Pahlsson is heading back to Sweden next year, having signed with Modo. So I guess we are one option down - should make RD happy.

Also, FWIW, apparently his agent said that while they had very cursory conversations with management about re-signing, he was told that the Nucks have "big plans" for the off-season. Presumably, said plans stood in the way of signing Pahlsson any time soon, if at all.

Like I said, that's from TEAM 1040 about 2 hrs ago.
wienerdog
CC 2nd Team All-Star
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby BladesofSteel on Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:41 pm

JonT21 wrote:I heard Jagr is testing free agency.

what do you guys think about this, should we try to sign him?

Close out his career with one of he best passers in the game? Why not?

Likelihood of him even considering Vancouver? Next to none.

The dudes a spoiled little bitch. Given the fact he's played his entire career in the Eastern conference, there is absolutely no way he'd consider playing his last days on a club that travels 72,000 miles a season.

"Bigger, Younger, Faster."
The grass is always greener
BladesofSteel
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:29 pm
Location: Lower left-hand corner

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby Hockey Widow on Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:10 pm

wienerdog wrote:1040 also reporting that Pahlsson is heading back to Sweden next year, having signed with Modo. So I guess we are one option down - should make RD happy.

Also, FWIW, apparently his agent said that while they had very cursory conversations with management about re-signing, he was told that the Nucks have "big plans" for the off-season. Presumably, said plans stood in the way of signing Pahlsson any time soon, if at all.

Like I said, that's from TEAM 1040 about 2 hrs ago.


At the time of the trade Per told us that Pahlsson had already committed to playing with Modo next year and that it would take something special to get Pahlsson to stay in the NHL. So no surprise but I did like him. We just don't need he and Manny both. That is if Manny can get back to where he was before the eye injury.

The big plan stuff coincides with the bold move stuff. Now all we have to do is wait and see if it really happens.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1544
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby Strangelove on Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:42 pm

coco_canuck wrote:
Strangelove wrote:Well we were specifically talking Mason Raymond and you said $3mil.

Maybe you should have set the parameters to price for soft-as-shit perimeter 15-goals-prorated-over-82-games tiny forwards who have missed 39 games over the past 2 seasons.

Hansen brings more to the table at half the cap-hit of Bambi.


I didn't say Raymond should get $3M, I said the cost for 15 goal scorers is in the $1.5-3M range, and Raymond's salary in the $2.5M range puts him in that range. He may be overpaid, but in terms of what it costs to sign top 7-9 forwards who can pot 15 goals, that's what it typically costs.


Wait so he's "overpaid" and he gets "what players like him typically cost"?? :crazy:

Raymond's salary was tripled ($883K - $2.55mil) after a 25 goal season.

Not a 15 goal season, a 25 goal season.

Soft-as-shit perimeter 15-goals-prorated-over-82-games forwards who have missed 39 games over the past 2 seasons that earn $2.55mil are largely considered to be on bad contracts. Obviously Gillis considers it a bad contract (hence the "cutdown arbitration"). I say Raymond at $2.21mil is still a bad contract.

Still wondering why you brought up Joel Ward's contract.

coco_canuck wrote:Hansen does bring more, but how many players can you sign in FA that can do what Hansen does at the same price?

The only way we get that type of value from a player, is if someone on an entry level deal steps up, and that's also no guarantee.


Well we've got Hansen (16 goals), Burrows(28), and Higgins(18) all doing more whilst earning less. Raymond was on a 15 goal pace (10 goals in 55 games). Big whoop. Ebbet (5 goals in 18 games) was on a 23 goal pace whilst earning a paltry $525K. I disagree with your blanket statement that 15-goal-scorers fall in the $1.5-3M range.

Lappy's career average is 10 goals-per-82-games with limited ice-time.

We don't need Raymond and the injury-prone pussy is not worth $2.21mil

coco_canuck wrote:the cost for even 3rd liners who can score 15 or so goals, or bring the package Ward brings that you described, varies up into the $3M range.

Now, I don't think Raymond is worth that money at the moment, but if Raymond turns in a serviceable year, is solid both ways, kills penalties, adds speed, and pots 15 goals, he'll get something similar to Ward money on the free agent market.


You keep saying you don't wanna compare contracts and you keep bringing up Ward's contract.

You're doing alotta spinning and why are you talking about what Raymond COULD be worth one year hence.

coco_canuck wrote:That's the point of emphasis here, that Raymond doesn't need to be a star to be bring average value to his salary that would be $2.21-2.6M.


With the way Raymond performed the past 2 seasons he's not worth $2.21-2.6mil.

coco_canuck wrote:
Strangelove wrote:BTW you neglected to mention whether or not the revelation supplied by yours truly... that Mayray could in fact opt for a 2-year contract... affected your opinion in this matter.


I haven't seen confirmation that this is the case, and even if Mason did opt for the two year option, I'm fine with it as long as Aquilini is prepared to eat the contract if it doesn't work out.

Even if he can't get sent down due to the new CBA, the salary isn't so onerous to dissuade Gillis from looking for ways to rid himself of the deal.


There is a 2-year option, scary if the rules change, Aqua can only eat so much, and Gillis might have probs ridding it.

Worse, I might hafta see Raymond in a Canuck uni again. :crazy:

NOT a fan of this move!

Strangelove: The Peoples Poster
User avatar
Strangelove
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby Hockey Widow on Mon Jun 18, 2012 5:28 pm

Doc

This move is perhaps just about retaining his rights without having to qualify him. I would suspect the Canucks will try to move him in a package. I also believe they will win their arbitration and if so his cap/salary will be more palatable to both the Canucks and making him more tradable.

Just my guess.

Yes, still a risk.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1544
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby RoyalDude on Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:39 pm

I'm starting to think that Strangelove was that guy who called in on 1040 the other day with tears streaming down his face threatening that "IF. MASONRAYMOND! IS IN A CANUCK UNIFORM NEXT SEASON!!! I...WILLNEVER!!! WATCH...ANOTHER GAME....AGAIN!!!! I'M SERIOUS!!!

It was either him or Tantalum
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate
RoyalDude
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2483
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Offseason Wheelings and Dealings

Postby CFP! on Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:30 pm

RoyalDude wrote:I'm starting to think that Strangelove was that guy who called in on 1040 the other day with tears streaming down his face threatening that "IF. MASONRAYMOND! IS IN A CANUCK UNIFORM NEXT SEASON!!! I...WILLNEVER!!! WATCH...ANOTHER GAME....AGAIN!!!! I'M SERIOUS!!!

It was either him or Tantalum


Tant doesn't have long distance, only nation wide.
CFP!
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:22 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Canucks Corner Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Island Nucklehead, Majestic-12 [Bot], qubikal and 1 guest