Moderator: Referees
Strangelove wrote:CO, Schenn would only be a part of the package coming back.
Love to get Hedman over here, but I keep hearing he's untouchable, as of course is Stamkos.
I could very well be wrong about Schenn, but personally I'd gamble on him if he came cheap.
Strangelove wrote:CO, Schenn would only be a part of the package coming back.
Love to get Hedman over here, but I keep hearing he's untouchable, as of course is Stamkos.
I could very well be wrong about Schenn, but personally I'd gamble on him if he came cheap.
donlever wrote:Eddy Punch Clock wrote:If had any money I'd put it all Luongo never becoming a Leaf.
What about the ganj farm?
And the hookers?
And the McFishie sangies?
RoyalDude wrote:People, Luke Schenn is not that good. He isn't the first disappointing high pick in the draft and certainly won't be the last. Being an excellent junior player means diddly. How many of those flash in the pans have we seen? Trillions. If I'm Gillis and I am talking trade with Burkie, Gardiner is the one I want. His ceiling is soooooo much higher than Schenns. Super skilled, super smart. Schenn is another David Booth Numbskull, why do you guys want to litter our line-up with a bunch of Brent Sopel numbskulls? Another painful fact about Schenn, he is almost as bad as a fighter as Weise.
Blob Mckenzie wrote:RoyalDude wrote:People, Luke Schenn is not that good. He isn't the first disappointing high pick in the draft and certainly won't be the last. Being an excellent junior player means diddly. How many of those flash in the pans have we seen? Trillions. If I'm Gillis and I am talking trade with Burkie, Gardiner is the one I want. His ceiling is soooooo much higher than Schenns. Super skilled, super smart. Schenn is another David Booth Numbskull, why do you guys want to litter our line-up with a bunch of Brent Sopel numbskulls? Another painful fact about Schenn, he is almost as bad as a fighter as Weise.
Schenn kicked the piss out of Weise............youtube is your friend.
Strangelove wrote:Island Nucklehead wrote:Strangelove wrote:Look at that Top Ten Goalies list, how many are available this summer??
Sorry I missed this one earlier. Certainly not many. And I'm sure we could reasonably ask for Schenn and the 5th overall and Burke would consider it.
Depending which media puppet is flapping their gums Luongo, Kipper, Thomas and Jonathan Bernier are available. Brodeur is a UFA but let's get real, he ain't playing anywhere but Jersey or a beer league. Not much else on the UFA list (Harding? Vokoun? Turco?).
WDF (wot da fock) buds, Bernier isn't even near being a **starter** yet, let alone "Top Ten".
Island Nucklehead wrote:Bernier's pedigree is remarkably similar to Schneiders (first round picks, AHL goalie of the year awards) and Bernier is 2 years younger. So while (just like Schneider) he isn't a starter yet, he will be in demand. If Tampa has their sights set on CS, and Gillis insists they take Luongo, they could very well pick up Bernier.
RoyalDude wrote:I also wouldn't be surprised to see Tim Thomas go to Tampa. Him and Martin St Louis are buddies, a cheaper route to go for Stevie Y than Luongo or Schnieder, since he would not command as much in return, only one year left on contract, etc.
clem wrote:I'm not too worried about which goalie stays. Pros & cons either way.
We need immediate as well as lasting benefit in return for our 1A/B. More than a Schenn.
Give me a package that brings Ted Purcell or James van Riemsdyk.
Farhan Lalji wrote:
(I don't expect James Gardiner, but some other decent prospect).
Users browsing this forum: NzVanFan and 4 guests