Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Meds
CC Legend
Posts: 5951
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Meds » Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:57 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote:He was garbage in game 6.........he was pretty weak in game 7.
He gets a pass on 2 of the 4 in game 7. The team still loses 2-0.

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 13423
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Hockey Widow » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:09 pm

Game 7, Hank scores on that first PP and it is a different game. Nothing Luongo could have done on that play.

Of course if Ehrhoff doesn't have a dislocated shoulder, if Hamhuis is playing, if Edler doesn't have 3 broken fingers, if Kesler has a good hip, if Burrows shoulder is ok, if Samuellson is healthy....

Ya I still blame it on all the injuries.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
rats19
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 8459
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:21 am
Location: over here.....

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by rats19 » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:18 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:Game 7, Hank scores on that first PP and it is a different game. Nothing Luongo could have done on that play.

Of course if Ehrhoff doesn't have a dislocated shoulder, if Hamhuis is playing, if Edler doesn't have 3 broken fingers, if Kesler has a good hip, if Burrows shoulder is ok, if Samuellson is healthy....

Ya I still blame it on all the injuries.
I am with HW on this....all due to injuries
You are who you hang with.....

User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Legend
Posts: 5227
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Uncle dans leg » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:54 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:Game 7, Hank scores on that first PP and it is a different game. Nothing Luongo could have done on that play.
Well if he could handle the puck he might have been able to headman it and catch them napping....
It's all Luongos' fault.
nobody forks...with the jesus

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 13423
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Hockey Widow » Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:11 pm

Uncle dans leg wrote:
Hockey Widow wrote:Game 7, Hank scores on that first PP and it is a different game. Nothing Luongo could have done on that play.
Well if he could handle the puck he might have been able to headman it and catch them napping....
It's all Luongos' fault.

Hank had an open net and pulled a Glass, missed the puck. Just saying.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Meds
CC Legend
Posts: 5951
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Meds » Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:12 pm

I can't believe we're still talking about this.....

What about Messier's vicious cross-check to Linden as he was trying to get off the ice back in game 7 of 94. Now that was some bullshit....

:look:

User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Legend
Posts: 5227
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Uncle dans leg » Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:25 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:
Uncle dans leg wrote:
Hockey Widow wrote:Game 7, Hank scores on that first PP and it is a different game. Nothing Luongo could have done on that play.
Well if he could handle the puck he might have been able to headman it and catch them napping....
It's all Luongos' fault.

Hank had an open net and pulled a Glass, missed the puck. Just saying.
I think I saw hank checking his own end alot...he still felt guilty for taking the C off of Luongos' helmet and must have been nervously checking if he's still pissed...
So you see it's ALWAYS Luongos' fault... even the lockout must be as well....somehow
nobody forks...with the jesus

User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Legend
Posts: 5227
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Uncle dans leg » Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:48 pm

Just heard on Wolves play-by-play that Markstrom hasn't been playing that well and has sat more than played. I checked and he has a GAA over 3 and is over .900 in S%, albeit in only 2 appearances. His partner has 3 starts.
I think following his progress for San Antonio could be quite relevant to the Luongo trade saga and if he appears to stumble at all then Florida becomes the prime destination. They definitely have the better assets as far as Vancouver should be concerned.
nobody forks...with the jesus

nuckster
MVP
MVP
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:35 am

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by nuckster » Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:06 am

Uncle dans leg wrote:Just heard on Wolves play-by-play that Markstrom hasn't been playing that well and has sat more than played. I checked and he has a GAA over 3 and is over .900 in S%, albeit in only 2 appearances. His partner has 3 starts.
I think following his progress for San Antonio could be quite relevant to the Luongo trade saga and if he appears to stumble at all then Florida becomes the prime destination. They definitely have the better assets as far as Vancouver should be concerned.
excellent point

one would also ahve to wonder about a Luongo, Nonis - Burke link. Nonis is likely sold on Luongo since he brought him here in the first place... an like other s have said copiously, Burke is fucked w/o Luongo... he can't be that stupid that he doesn't realize that!? Maybe it'll be a three way? Van to TO and then TO to FLA and FLA to Van.. ? itime will tell i guewss... but really, they're all stupid bastards anyways ... frikin lockout...jeeesus
cc oldtimer

FAN
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:55 pm

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by FAN » Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:46 am

nuckster wrote: one would also ahve to wonder about a Luongo, Nonis - Burke link. Nonis is likely sold on Luongo since he brought him here in the first place... an like other s have said copiously, Burke is fucked w/o Luongo... he can't be that stupid that he doesn't realize that!?
Well Burke can be stubborn and acquiring goaltending is not his strong suite. Vancouver? Goaltending problems. Anaheim? He was lucky to inherit Giguere. Allaire pushed Burke to sign Hiller and Burke gave up Bryzgalov for nothing. Toronto? Goaltending problems. if there's a guy Burke likes he's very much willing to pay the price. But I won't count on Burke being willing to give up what it takes to acquire a good goaltender like Luongo. Burke is funny that way sometimes.

BigTuna
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:16 am

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by BigTuna » Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:02 am

[quote="nuckster"][quote="Uncle dans leg"]Just heard on Wolves play-by-play that Markstrom hasn't been playing that well and has sat more than played. I checked and he has a GAA over 3 and is over .900 in S%, albeit in only 2 appearances. His partner has 3 starts.
I think following his progress for San Antonio could be quite relevant to the Luongo trade saga and if he appears to stumble at all then Florida becomes the prime destination. They definitely have the better assets as far as Vancouver should be concerned.[/quote]

excellent point

one would also ahve to wonder about a Luongo, Nonis - Burke link. Nonis is likely sold on Luongo since he brought him here in the first place... an like other s have said copiously, Burke is fucked w/o Luongo... he can't be that stupid that he doesn't realize that!? Maybe it'll be a three way? Van to TO and then TO to FLA and FLA to Van.. ? itime will tell i guewss... but really, they're all stupid bastards anyways ... frikin lockout...jeeesus[/quote]


How is Burke fucked without Luongo exactly? They're rebuilding and have a trio of very good young goalies/prospects in net.

What will Luongo do for Toronto? Get them to fight for 8th and screw-up their rebuilding plans.


us, Burke will never take on that terrible Luongo contract. Neither will a team bleeding money like Florida. Luongo is virtually worthless.

BigTuna
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:16 am

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by BigTuna » Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:03 am

[quote="Blob Mckenzie"]Meh , we're splitting hairs here but I would say they didn't have a great playoffs. One say could Kesler as well only had one decent series if we only look at offence.

I'm done on this .... no more highjacking from me.

[b]I don't think we will get both Gardiner and a 1st ,I think it will be either a 1st/Gardiner/Rielly and other assets. [/b]Just my opinion. I do not want ANY of Colborne, Kadri or Kulemi or Bozek....... all crap pieces and fatso Burke can keep them.

I would do Gardiner and Biggs
Rielly and Ashton
1st, Finn, +

If Burke wants to add in garbage and shit he can beat it.

There is also the option of Gillis adding in Hansen who has a great value contract and upside if that's what it takes to get a deal done. Vancouver is loaded with 2/3 line tweeners.[/quote]

Wow! You guys are delusional.

User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
CC Legend
Posts: 11543
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by Blob Mckenzie » Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:34 am

Luongo isn't worthless, we aren't delusional but you sir need to learn how to use the quote feature.

Welcome back Little Tuna!
TRY TO FOCUS ON HOW MY ASS TASTES IN ONE YEAR

BigTuna
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:16 am

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by BigTuna » Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:01 am

Blob Mckenzie wrote:Luongo isn't worthless, we aren't delusional but you sir need to learn how to use the quote feature.

Welcome back Little Tuna!



So Burke is going to give up rielly or Gardiner for Luongo? No chance in hell.

User avatar
the Dogsalmon
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 665
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:12 am
Location: in the ainus

Re: Luongo will Waive NTC If Asked To

Post by the Dogsalmon » Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:42 am

Reilly straight up for Lou...

Post Reply