Fred wrote:I know fans want Kassian to be a monster out there and have the skills of Henrik but at this point he is what he is. Some times I'm wondering if he might go to the wrong bench for a line change

He just doesn't seem to be adjusting IMO. Bitz on the other hand is more NHL ready...assuming his health is OK...
I'm hoping Kassian comes back next year knowing what to expect and ready to deal with it, but that's next season we still have a lot to do this season
It's as plain as day for those who can call a spade a spade instead going all 'see no monkey, hear no monkey' regarding Kassian. The kid is a project and a project is what this team 'currently' does not need. But ya know, I'm a troll for saying anything untoward against Kassian.
When the trade was made everyone was all "great trade, we now have some toughness who can play on the top 3 lines for when we play the Bruins of the world". For about a week after the trade the media kept showing footage of Lucic beating people up and Marchand taking liberties on the Sedins, etc., as to what Kassian was brought in to do, to add an element of toughness on the top 3 lines in which he clearly isn't ready to do. The kid needs kid gloves right now, but he was suppose to be ready to take on the challenge of being our supposed Lucic RIGHT NOW. I mean, everyone kept going on about how we need to get tougher, we need to get tougher in our top 3 lines. "trade for Ott, trade for Neil", etc. Come to Kassian/Hodgson trade "GREAT WE HAVE THAT GUY". 16 games later, the kid looks completely lost out there. But hey, we have Pahlsson.
IMO, you just don't trade a player of Hodgson's skill set and on ice vision and current state of maturity in play for a project like Kassian with the win now mentality. It's like taking one step forward and two steps backwards. We now struggle to score goals, our 2nd line has completely disappeared and we are going back to Bitz. Don't get it. But hey, shoot me for not liking the Kassian/Hodgson trade, I'm not suppose to say anything bad about it. I should be more focused on tearing strips of a player named Mason Raymond who was nearly made a paraplegic at the beginning of last summer and spent the off-season in a brace and not afforded the proper luxury to properly train for the next season. I must completely ignore that and then wonder why he looks weak on his skates. I mean, if anyone has ever had back issues like myself, you will know that if you have back issues that there is a serious impact from that affecting your core strength and especially leg strength, in which both of those are very important to playing hockey. I mean, I made the same mistake in criticizing Hodgson at first because I bought into everyone saying that Hodgson has skating issues, when it was his back problems that made him look so weak on his skates at first. See what a solid off-season of training, injury free in that off-season can do for a player's strength? I was sold. But hey, Raymond ain't allowed excuses but Malhotra and Kassian and Booth are. "He falls down a lot, he falls down a lot!" like it's a fucking mystery as to why.
Regarding Skill vs Toughness. I saw a game last night - St. Louis vs Detroit in the madhouse of St. Louis where the Blues were throwing all kinds of toughness at the Red Wings every shift, even Babcock commented about the tough play of the Blues. The end result, Skill won in the end. Skills sells tickets, skill wins games.
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate