Now in Buffalo he's a top 6 D-man, playing with Erhoff (team Deutchland
Where was this play in Vancouver?
But we still have Rome & Alberts....
Moderator: Referees
Zamboni Driver wrote:So we traded CoHo (the better player) for Kassian, a gritty winger with toughness & MAG, a puck-moving D with some defensive issues. Sulzer was just supposed to be a throw-in, he was about #9 on our depth chart.
Now in Buffalo he's a top 6 D-man, playing with Erhoff (team Deutchland), he's playing 16 - 19 min a night, and has a goal & 2 assists in the last 5 games.
![]()
Where was this play in Vancouver?![]()
But we still have Rome & Alberts....
dhabums wrote:Zamboni Driver wrote:So we traded CoHo (the better player) for Kassian, a gritty winger with toughness & MAG, a puck-moving D with some defensive issues. Sulzer was just supposed to be a throw-in, he was about #9 on our depth chart.
Now in Buffalo he's a top 6 D-man, playing with Erhoff (team Deutchland), he's playing 16 - 19 min a night, and has a goal & 2 assists in the last 5 games.
![]()
Where was this play in Vancouver?![]()
But we still have Rome & Alberts....
If you look at the standings you will find your answer.
Hockey Widow wrote:Sulzer is another one that AV never trusted for some reason. The few chances I got to see him play I thought he was better than both Alberts and Rome but he doesn't have that "tough" streak AV likes in D men. As for MAGS, I would be surprised if he sees the playoffs unless there are injuries. He is not an AV type of player.
Hockey Widow wrote:Sulzer is another one that AV never trusted for some reason. The few chances I got to see him play I thought he was better than both Alberts and Rome but he doesn't have that "tough" streak AV likes in D men. As for MAGS, I would be surprised if he sees the playoffs unless there are injuries. He is not an AV type of player.
Fred wrote:Hockey Widow wrote:Sulzer is another one that AV never trusted for some reason. The few chances I got to see him play I thought he was better than both Alberts and Rome but he doesn't have that "tough" streak AV likes in D men. As for MAGS, I would be surprised if he sees the playoffs unless there are injuries. He is not an AV type of player.
Should folks start questioning AV choices ?
dhabums wrote:
I'd love to, but then I keep looking at the standings. Like every other NHL coach, he isnt perfect. However, the second we have a better option i hope we take it.
Fred wrote:Hockey Widow wrote:Sulzer is another one that AV never trusted for some reason. The few chances I got to see him play I thought he was better than both Alberts and Rome but he doesn't have that "tough" streak AV likes in D men. As for MAGS, I would be surprised if he sees the playoffs unless there are injuries. He is not an AV type of player.
Should folks start questioning AV choices ?
CrzyCanuck wrote:quick, who can list our AV's favoured players since the day he took over Canucks?
Rypien, Cowan, Green, Rome, anyone else?
CrzyCanuck wrote:quick, who can list our AV's favoured players since the day he took over Canucks?
Rypien, Cowan, Green, Rome, anyone else?
Me - If I coached now I could do the same, if I was the GM back in the WCE days I would have made a trade for a REAL GOALIE and by now I would have 2 - 3 SC rings.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests