Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
LotusBlossom
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 2448
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:53 pm
Location: Metro Vancouver
Contact:

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by LotusBlossom » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:21 am

Orcasfan wrote:Thanks, Mondi, for a great summation of the pathetic state of the local sports MSM! Totally agree! The papers are a joke, especially the Province. I do not understand why Gallagher still has a job! :look: And that idiot-filled 1040 mostly makes me shudder. I actually had some hope for Rintoule a while back - I figured he was young enough to maybe learn about hockey (instead of football!). I was wrong. :( I really don't get it....everyone knows that Vancouver is predominantly a hockey town, yet none of these so-called sports journalists knows squat about hockey! And, despite all their years yapping about it, they still haven't learned enough to have an intelligent discussion about the Canucks! Are they just very lazy buggers, or are they lacking something like curiosity? :look:

Actually, even though I do not appreciate Sekeris' attitude of shit-stirring to create a "story", he does appear to have a modicum of intelligence. His knowledge of (professional) sports is wider than his colleagues, though his hockey knowledge is still too low. Once again, though, it seems his main approach is focused on the hunt for a "story", as opposed to getting into the game itself!

And, like so many of us, I turn to the blogosphere to explore, learn and discuss all things Canucks! Though some discretion is essential there too! :wink:
This is what I mean about a town that only cares about hockey, and that's ok, but it is a sports radio station. There are other sports besides Canucks hockey, which is why TEAM1040 covers other things and talk about things like football. Rintoul is a really fun guy to listen to about football.

But admittedly, Farhan Lalji (the real one) is far better to listen to when he subs in for people than anyone on the station regularly.

Harrison Mooney aka Pass It to Bulis (he's a friend, I'm biased) and Wyatt Arndt are my favourite guys that blog about the Canucks. That Cam Charron kid is pretty good too, he just can't handle his liquor. ;)
parfois, je veux juste laisser tinber un coude volant sur le monde

Fred
CC Legend
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:00 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by Fred » Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:09 pm

I have to think that MG had a few things to say to HNIC execs
AROUND THE BOARDS



After Hockey Night in Canada officials made a presentation to the NHL’s board of governors’ meeting last Saturday during all-star weekend in Ottawa, more than one Canadian team went on the offensive and there were plenty of fireworks in the room. While it’s been well-publicized that Brian Burke isn’t happy with the way Don Cherry has been criticizing Leaves coach Ron Wilson, the Sun has confirmed the Toronto president/GM isn’t the only one who voiced his opinion to CBC officials. Sources say Senators owner Eugene Melnyk followed up on Burke’s tirade by complaining about the amount of national exposure Ottawa gets on HNIC. The piling-on continued as Habs owner Geoff Molson let CBC know he had his own issues with the broadcast. Sounds like it was fun. All this doesn’t bode well for CBC retaining the national rights when the contract expires in 2013 ...
cheers

ESQ
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2577
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by ESQ » Sun Feb 05, 2012 2:19 pm

If anyone is curious, Jim Hughson's CBC contract ends one season after CBC's national broadcasting contract does.

At first I was resistant to seeing TSN get the national rights, but they have improved the last couple seasons while CBC has gotten worse. I like Gord Miller's call, love Ferraro, am amused by Maguire, don't care much for Cuthbert but I know I'm in the minority on that, and I think the Panel is the best in the business. Bob McKenzie seems to be the most connected hockey writer in the business, and has a ton of credibility. Hughson is still the best in the game, Bob Cole probably second-best, but the drop-off is steep after that and the panel stinks. I actually miss Hrudey's Behind the Mask segment, he really gave awesome firsthand insight into his playing days. To replace that with 7 hours of Ron Maclean, Milbury, and PJ frickin Stock is a travesty.

But the main thing I'd like to see is improved national coverage of hockey worth watching. Sorry, but the Leaves are not important anymore. They can't go out and buy up any player they want, they're not very good, they're riding one of the longest active post-season droughts, they just. don't. matter. In spite of that, I would say that the Van-Tor game was probably the best HNIC game of the year so far, but that doesn't hold a candle to Van-Det in December or Van-Bos in January.

I watch the NBC national games quite often, and I think they do a great job. They have a clear preference to big-market teams - Philly, Rangers, Chicago, Washington, Detroit - but they focus exclusively on the good teams. You're never going to see a Carolina-Islanders game, because they want to grow the game by showcasing good hockey. Unfortunately, the eastern Canadian teams have been so terrible the last couple years that the games have suffered, and that includes Montreal and Ottawa in a big way.

I think Pratt once aptly compared HNIC to Monday Night Football - you would never see a team that is the equivalent of the Leaves on the premiere national broadcast. That is what I would like to see, instead of rewarding Leaves for being shitty and in the biggest city by giving them the biggest exposure.

User avatar
Madcombinepilot
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3365
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
Location: Saskatoon, Sk.

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by Madcombinepilot » Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:39 pm

+1
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.

dbr
CC Legend
Posts: 3050
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by dbr » Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:47 am

Unfortunately the Leaves are near relevance again; while the CBC might've reconsidered their heavy coverage of that team while they were terrible, ignoring a playoff contender in the league's biggest market would just be foolish.

I wouldn't expect TSN to approach Saturday nights differently if they outbid the CBC for the broadcast rights, either (although I completely agree that their personnel is almost universally superior to HNIC - I do like Jim Hughson and Elliotte Friedman though).

ESQ
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2577
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by ESQ » Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:09 pm

dbr wrote:Unfortunately the Leaves are near relevance again
That is unfortunate - 8th place in the East is cause for celebration :( But still, they're not buying up all the good players or going deep in the playoffs, and I don't see that happening under the current regime anyways. Plus, they still haven't managed to get any elite prospects to get excited over.
dbr wrote:I wouldn't expect TSN to approach Saturday nights differently if they outbid the CBC for the broadcast rights, either
You may be right. But I've gotten the impression that TSN gives more league-wide coverage, including US-based teams. TSN does always give Toronto the lead spot, its true, but I think they give equal time to the other Canadian teams. Unless of course something happens with one of Pierre's monsters, then all bets are off.

I kinda like Elliote Friedman too, but more for his writing than his on-air persona.

wafflecombine
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 367
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:20 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by wafflecombine » Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:53 am

I'm afraid that I wouldn't shed a tear if HNIC got scooped by TSN. Over the last couple years I've felt the quality of commentary on the CBC has gone downhill and has a pretty heavy, nearly homerism bias. Typically I find the play by play, the punditry and camera angle/replay better on TSN. I'll admit to a morbid fascination with Coach's Corner simply because its always fascinating to see how far, and at what angle Grapes will try to get both feet in his mouth.

Personally, I'm all over the NHL centre ice package. Dial in on the 'Nucks.... maybe channel surf to see if someone is beating Boston (those are happy nights) and quickly check scores before heading back to the Canucks main event.

Its all about value for money and sadly, the CBC is providing less and less value... and not just in hockey broadcasting.

Fred
CC Legend
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:00 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by Fred » Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:34 am

I'm not a fan of HNIC and the format they use especially the economic model is out dated. We don't need a force fed diet of Leaf Hockey or media reports from the Golden horseshoe. I might have been justifiable in the fifties when folks watch 12" black & white but if SN can manage regional shows so to can HNIC. The CBC has based it's model on Ontario being the centre of the universe and every thing disseminates from there. That's no longer need financially. Frankly I don't watch much of the CBC regular programming either these days. They've missed the boat, the market has changed and so to has the technology to deliver it.

But today's HNIC in particular in no longer my cup of tea. Ron McLean strikes me as a snob who referees hockey, I question if he ever played the game above PeeWee ( it was his way of being noticed as a kid...officiating :o ) Rather than a fancy dress clown show how about a real hockey analyst during the intermission and it would be nice if they just showed regional presentations...if any one wants to pick up the Leaves game it now possible...does HNIC get that subtle point, but don't blast it to every one because that's the way we did it in the fifties
cheers

dbr
CC Legend
Posts: 3050
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by dbr » Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:36 am

ESQ wrote:That is unfortunate - 8th place in the East is cause for celebration :( But still, they're not buying up all the good players or going deep in the playoffs, and I don't see that happening under the current regime anyways. Plus, they still haven't managed to get any elite prospects to get excited over.
Well, it's something Leaves ownership has known for decades - you don't have to shoot for the moon, when you have captive audience of that size you'll always have a great bottom line so anything other than a complete embarrassment is good enough.
ESQ wrote:You may be right. But I've gotten the impression that TSN gives more league-wide coverage, including US-based teams. TSN does always give Toronto the lead spot, its true, but I think they give equal time to the other Canadian teams. Unless of course something happens with one of Pierre's monsters, then all bets are off.
I don't know if you're gauging that based on their SportsCentre coverage but if you're basing it on the NHL games they show now, they don't really have a choice - they pretty much get whatever the CBC doesn't (ie. not many Leaves games), right?
ESQ wrote:I kinda like Elliote Friedman too, but more for his writing than his on-air persona.
Yeah I strictly meant for his blog, I haven't seen much of him on the idesk or whatever that segment is called.

Fred
CC Legend
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:00 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by Fred » Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:26 pm

An Interesting point raised on Nucks misconduct. Should nationally televised games have announcers that do private promotional advertising in local markets. He used the case of Craig Simpson who live in Edmonton ( I believe ...Alberta any way ) apparently does a lot of advertising gigs locally ( in Alberta ) and then can't contain himself from sounding like an Alberta cheer leader while doing a nationally televised game ?
cheers

ESQ
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2577
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by ESQ » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:11 am

Mondi wrote:Blake Price had two talking points today and he really stuck to them...

1. Is Minnesota for real?
2. Is Minnesota a rival?

And his (learned) opinions.

1. No, despite what guys who know something about hockey say (i.e. Pierre McGuire).
2. Minnesota considers Vancouver a bigger rival than Vancouver considers Minnesota.

What insight.
Turns out, Price was actually right :wow:
I actually went digging for this post because I was sure Price said they were for real, never imagining he would actually turn out to be correct...but there's a first time for everything.

User avatar
dhabums
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:55 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by dhabums » Wed Feb 15, 2012 2:53 pm

Fred wrote:An Interesting point raised on Nucks misconduct. Should nationally televised games have announcers that do private promotional advertising in local markets. He used the case of Craig Simpson who live in Edmonton ( I believe ...Alberta any way ) apparently does a lot of advertising gigs locally ( in Alberta ) and then can't contain himself from sounding like an Alberta cheer leader while doing a nationally televised game ?
Clearly it is time to hire machines to broadcast games.

User avatar
mr perfect
MVP
MVP
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:32 pm
Location: perfectville

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by mr perfect » Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:27 am

Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mondi wrote:Jeff Paterson has the most obnoxious radio voice I have ever heard.

I'm not sure who I'd like to punch out more Jeff Paterson or Don Taylor .

As an asside what is up with Neil Macrae ? Did he have a stroke or something ? Maybe Parkinsons...... Huntingtons disease ? His speech sounds a little slurred..... yeah I know he's a wrinser but he sounds a lot different these days and he did take a lot of time off in the last couple of years.
You'll get a laugh out of this; On Monday Paterson on 1040 was referred to as the resident tennis guy. Figures...............

User avatar
Chef Boi RD
CC Legend
Posts: 15803
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by Chef Boi RD » Sat Feb 18, 2012 9:49 am

I don't agree much with Tony Skeletor Gallagher but I agree with his concerns regarding the Sedins play over the last while. If these two are starting their downward trending now, we are in trouble.
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate

User avatar
Orcasfan
CC Veteran
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:28 pm

Re: Vancouver's Hockey "Media"

Post by Orcasfan » Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:49 am

I have noticed a troubling development in the last couple of years, that has especially escalated since last year. And that is the stated assumption that the only "real" success for this team is to win the Cup. Anything less is deemed a failure! This attitude is rife throughout the MSM as well as the blogosphere. This ridiculous attitude really pisses me off! :mad: It's fine to have high expectations and hopes. But why should that translate into "anything less than winning the Cup is a failure"? In particular, to consider the season that the Canucks had last year as a failure is nonsense! :wow:

I wonder if this attitude is applied to people's own lives. :hmmm: To see and measure your own life and "accomplishments" based on such absolute standards of success and failure would be scary, to say the least. Surely, as adults, we have learned that "success" and "failure" are based more on just "winning". Don't we consider making the playoffs to be more successful than not? And making it to the Conference final is certainly a measure of relative success, isn't it? Of course, I would love for the Canucks to win it all! But no way do I label the team and their season as a failure when they lose game 7 of the SCF!

As the team has become more "successful", expectations have naturally risen. But expectations, especially from the MSM (which fuels those of the fans), are rarely met in professional sports. There are just too many random factors that will influence the "success" of a team. We are so lucky as fans to have this team to cheer for. Let's enjoy it while we can and resist judging "success" or "failure" in such extreme terms.

Post Reply