Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Southern_Canuck » Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:30 pm

78 points in 63 games to reach 97 points (39-24-0)... can the Canucks do it? (Chicago finished 8th in the Western Conference with 97 points last season, and Colorado had 95 points for 8th in 2009-10)

Almost a quarter of the way into the season, and the Canucks are 9-9-1. They are painting themselves in a bit of a corner, and if they continue to "win one - lose one", they will have to have a stellar second half just to make the playoffs.

I believe they will do it.

S_C
It's a great day for hockey!
User avatar
Southern_Canuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1392
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Blob Mckenzie » Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:51 pm

What happens if they miss ? Does AV walk the plank ?

I can't imagine the Italians will be enamored with MG unless the 8.5 million dollars worth of hockey players he pulled out of Florida start producing. That's a lot of salary to get rid of if those two characters continue their mediocre ways.

I'm willing to cut Booth some slack because he's ten games in and he has wheels to burn. That said he came advertised as a power forward which he certainly is not. That term gets tossed around an awful lot these days .

Ballard through no fault of his own cannot seem to play the right side at all. I thought the dude had a lot more offensive skill and while he has been fine defensively he needs to hit 30 points to justify his salary . I guess that's a bit difficult with NO PP time and playing 14 minutes a night. Not all Ballards fault here but the pro scouting in Vancouver leaves a LOT to be desired. Sure they picked up a nice player in Rome, but wtf is up with Weise, Ryan Johnson, Sulzer, Matt Schneider, among many others. SOMEONE should have clued into the fact that Ballard is completley fucking useless on the right side.

I don't buy that they didn't know that Dan Hamhuis would sign here, therefore Ballard was a pre-emptive strike. There were other options including Willie Mitchell.

i think KB4 takes a shitload of heat for a lot of things he can't control. I used to think he was a pretty damned good player when he played for the Coyotes.

MG better hope that Booth cranks it up a bit and at least hits 20 goals. If he is a dud MG's track record is going to look a little sketchy. His drafting is already looking fairly weak.
Tell me how my ass tastes.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
CC Legend
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Potatoe1 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:59 pm

Anyone who thinks the will miss is a fairly major bed wetter.

Forget the playoff cut off look at this division. I will be shocked if the Canucks don't finish 3rd. Who is going to beat them in this division?

The wild are first right now but their roster sucks donkey balls.
Potatoe1
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1613
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:06 pm

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby dhabums » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:08 pm

Southern_Canuck wrote:78 points in 63 games to reach 97 points (39-24-0)... can the Canucks do it? (Chicago finished 8th in the Western Conference with 97 points last season, and Colorado had 95 points for 8th in 2009-10)

Almost a quarter of the way into the season, and the Canucks are 9-9-1. They are painting themselves in a bit of a corner, and if they continue to "win one - lose one", they will have to have a stellar second half just to make the playoffs.

I believe they will do it.

S_C


Wow, am I surprised you didn't mention 91 pts made it the 2 seasons previous to 09/10. That would really undercut the point.
User avatar
dhabums
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1288
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:55 pm

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Uncle dans leg » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:22 pm

I there's a team in this league that can win at a .650 pace, it's Vancouver. If they get something out of Booth and Kesler then there's no reason why they can't return to last years form.
Sure hoping it's Alberts who gets the nod for Ballard. Sulzer is a fill in at best IMO.

I reckon they turn it around, just hope its soon and not in a month.
nobody forks with...the jesus
User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1956
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: Lethbridge AB

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Rumsfeld » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:35 pm

They'll win the division again, but the fact that we're hoping we can go on a run to overtake the effing wild is what really sucks donkey balls.

I predicted we'd finish second in the West. That seems ambitious at this point, but it's a long season and we tend to go on tears in the second half. Our goaltending and even-strength play has been atrocious, but you have to think at least the latter will improve dramatically.

If it doesn't, and soon, AV should be shitcanned. This team is too talented to struggle 5-on-5 for extended periods, and if the lethargy continues you have to conclude they've tuned him out.
Cowards die a thousand times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Pissed in the Canyon

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby CorranHorn » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:36 pm

That's just it Dan, this team is wholly under-performing. I feel like everyone on this team has shat that bed on at least one occasion this year, so far.

That being said, I have full faith that we'll turn it around here in a few. The likes of Kes, Booth and Bur are going to start settling in.

On a side note, anyone else notice how poorly silent G has played on HOME ice this year. It's like he's trying to do too much out there, trying to impress the home crowd. I hope the coaching staff has realized this and are trying to get him to settle down his game.
User avatar
CorranHorn
CC Veteran
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Blob Mckenzie » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:45 pm

Potatoe1 wrote:Anyone who thinks the will miss is a fairly major bed wetter.



Haven't heard anyone say that yet. They are in a garbage division, making the playoffs should be fairly easy for them .
Tell me how my ass tastes.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
CC Legend
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Uncle dans leg » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:49 pm

CorranHorn wrote:That's just it Dan, this team is wholly under-performing. I feel like everyone on this team has shat that bed on at least one occasion this year, so far.

That being said, I have full faith that we'll turn it around here in a few. The likes of Kes, Booth and Bur are going to start settling in.

Last year, didn't Vancouver get smoked hard like 7-1 by the Hawks right around this time of year then go on to have the best year in franchise history? They weren't playing well then either right? I was in Australia so I didn't have a good feel for the team but from afar it seemed much like this year.
What I'm thinking is they needed to get their asses handed to them (like last night) by a hated rival (like last night) before they look in the mirror and sort their shit out. Yesterday was a shit smear of a game and it has to mark a low point for the season. It has to. If it doesn't then these guys are toast.
nobody forks with...the jesus
User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1956
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: Lethbridge AB

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Fred » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:53 pm

I've sold most of my tickets so far this season. I went to the St L game a couple of games ago and the lethargy of the players was frankly pathetic. You don't always see it on TV. But no zip or excitment in their game. They have tied up approx $9 mill between Ballard and Booth and are right up to the limit on Cap space. Hell the Wolves are sucking too. There's not a lot that can be done. They look like the Hawks last season
cheers
Fred
CC Legend
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:00 pm

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Rumsfeld » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:55 pm

I don't remember our record after 20 last year but I'm sure it was a lot better than our record right now. And it's asking a lot of a team to expect the same kind of ridiculous winning streaks we had last season.
Cowards die a thousand times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Pissed in the Canyon

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby LotusBlossom » Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:01 pm

And it starts... :roll: :lol:

They are playing .500 hockey. I guess they either pull up their socks now, or Fred will never attend another game this year at Rogers Arena. :P

Sold one set of my tickets, kept the other. Only reason I haven't been going to many game this season is my schedule of life outside of the Canucks takes priority, and I will be the first to say I haven't seen much of them this year as I would have liked to, but all I want is a game where they play 60 minutes. Much like the one they played in LA and vs the Islanders.

I haven't hit the panic button yet, but if they lose to the Sens on Sunday, I might start to inch my finger closer to it or sell my tickets like Fred :look:

Oh yeah, this scheduling sucks,what kind of bullshit is that? Nice long layoffs after with stupid back to backs? Oh, but in March, the Canucks are playing almost every other night and only have four road games. :evil:
Didn't you know?I'm Front Page news! ;)
User avatar
LotusBlossom
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
 
Posts: 2448
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:53 pm
Location: Metro Vancouver

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Rumsfeld » Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:03 pm

LotusBlossom wrote:Oh yeah, this scheduling sucks,what kind of bullshit is that? Nice long layoffs after with stupid back to backs? Oh, but in March, the Canucks are playing almost every other night and only have four road games. :evil:


Agreed LB, our schedule looks even more fucked up than usual. We do get a lot of mediocre teams for the next while at least.
Cowards die a thousand times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Pissed in the Canyon

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Uncle dans leg » Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:09 pm

Canucks record month by month

October- 4-3-2
November- 8-4-1
December- 11-1-2
January- 8-2-4
February- 8-5-0
March- 13-2-0
April- 2-2-0

They had a better November for sure but they really took off in December. Considering the injuries and the hangover issues its actually not that far off last years record. Cranking it up in December set the stage for the rest of the year.

I think it can happen. The personnel is pretty close to the same and its obvious they aren't really into it yet. All it will take is to find their mojo and we could be back on top within a month, no problem.
nobody forks with...the jesus
User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1956
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: Lethbridge AB

Re: Hmmm... it's early, but 39-24...?

Postby Rumsfeld » Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:12 pm

That was one hell of a March we had last year, no pun intended.

IIRC our two losses in April came at the hands of the mighty Oilers. That was gay.
Cowards die a thousand times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Pissed in the Canyon

Next

Return to Canucks Corner Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Lancer, rats19 and 6 guests