Moderator: Referees
Blob Mckenzie wrote:That 1st seed could be very important come 2nd round. Barring a catastrophe I'd rather see Vancouver avoid Nashville/Detroit until the 3rd round. Make St Louis go toe to toe with one of those teams in the 2nd round.
Hockey Widow wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:That 1st seed could be very important come 2nd round. Barring a catastrophe I'd rather see Vancouver avoid Nashville/Detroit until the 3rd round. Make St Louis go toe to toe with one of those teams in the 2nd round.
Home ice may mean more to St. Louis than it does us. It is so hard to predict the 1st round match ups let alone the 2nd round. I hear what you are saying but I think Chicago takes round one which leaves the top seed to play them next, potentially, which means second seed plays winner of Detroit/Nashville. But if the top 4 survive round one then 1st seed gets winner of Nashville/Detroit. Which would mean we would be better off getting 2nd seed.
So many variables too hard to predict.
Arachnid wrote:Hockey Widow wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:That 1st seed could be very important come 2nd round. Barring a catastrophe I'd rather see Vancouver avoid Nashville/Detroit until the 3rd round. Make St Louis go toe to toe with one of those teams in the 2nd round.
Home ice may mean more to St. Louis than it does us. It is so hard to predict the 1st round match ups let alone the 2nd round. I hear what you are saying but I think Chicago takes round one which leaves the top seed to play them next, potentially, which means second seed plays winner of Detroit/Nashville. But if the top 4 survive round one then 1st seed gets winner of Nashville/Detroit. Which would mean we would be better off getting 2nd seed.
So many variables too hard to predict.
Swing! There is nothing hotter than a babe that loves/knows her hockey....well there's velcro....
Hockey Widow wrote:Arachnid wrote:Hockey Widow wrote:
Home ice may mean more to St. Louis than it does us. It is so hard to predict the 1st round match ups let alone the 2nd round. I hear what you are saying but I think Chicago takes round one which leaves the top seed to play them next, potentially, which means second seed plays winner of Detroit/Nashville. But if the top 4 survive round one then 1st seed gets winner of Nashville/Detroit. Which would mean we would be better off getting 2nd seed.
So many variables too hard to predict.
Swing! There is nothing hotter than a babe that loves/knows her hockey....well there's velcro....
The last time I wore velcro was for a harness (oops, did I just say that)?

Blob Mckenzie wrote:HW I guess i should have mentioned i think the Hawks will take out the Paicific Division winner in the 1st round.
I'd much rather see Vancouver play Chicago in the 2nd round than Detroit or Nashville.

rockalt wrote:I feel your pain Farhan! Blackhawks end up being great beneficiaries. I was so looking forward to seeing them face the Kings in the first round but barring a complete meltdown by the 'Yotes, the Hawks will draw the easiest first round opponent. What a reward for being the weakest (albeit marginally) team in the Central!
Meanwhile, the Canucks are stuck with either the Kings or Sharks. In an ideal world, we would have drawn the 'Yotes with the Hawks getting the Kings and the Blues getting the Sharks. Would have made for more compelling first round series!
Speaking of which, WTF were the Red Wings thinking coming back in the 3rd? Seriously! I guess you could argue they were playing for home ice advantage (even though the Preds would still have to lose) but they would have been infinitely better off simply tanking it and drawing the 'Yotes in the first round! Idiots!
Hockey Widow wrote:rockalt wrote:I feel your pain Farhan! Blackhawks end up being great beneficiaries. I was so looking forward to seeing them face the Kings in the first round but barring a complete meltdown by the 'Yotes, the Hawks will draw the easiest first round opponent. What a reward for being the weakest (albeit marginally) team in the Central!
Meanwhile, the Canucks are stuck with either the Kings or Sharks. In an ideal world, we would have drawn the 'Yotes with the Hawks getting the Kings and the Blues getting the Sharks. Would have made for more compelling first round series!
Speaking of which, WTF were the Red Wings thinking coming back in the 3rd? Seriously! I guess you could argue they were playing for home ice advantage (even though the Preds would still have to lose) but they would have been infinitely better off simply tanking it and drawing the 'Yotes in the first round! Idiots!
When you are about being a winning franchise I think it is hard to lose on purpose. And yes, they were still fighting for home ice advantage.

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Raile and 4 guests