Page 7 of 7

Re: Bertuzzi/Moore

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:28 am
by Arachnid
Looks like Moore money for the team formally known as The Orcas

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/h ... le2312475/

Re: Bertuzzi/Moore

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:39 pm
by Fred
I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...

For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?

I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?

I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?

I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision

Re: Bertuzzi/Moore

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:01 pm
by dhabums
Fred wrote:I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...

For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?

I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?

I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?

I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision
Reasons for judgment, not that it will likely get that far.

The court uses the evidence provided.

Personal injury claims often take years.

Because it was filed in Ontario.

Re: Bertuzzi/Moore

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:53 pm
by Arachnid
Why does this story always rear it's ugly head when there is hockey in the air (Playoffs, draft, free-agency, start of season).

http://www.thestar.com/sports/hockey/nh ... -struggles

I don't believe it for a minute.

Something stinks to high heaven here.

I think he is milking this as a way to a cool 60 million as opposed to working hard to overcome all the odds and have a career

Steve Moore you are a coward and a pansy and your name will forever be etched in shame if you continue this route...get a real job and suck it the fuck up...

:evil:

Re: Bertuzzi/Moore

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:12 pm
by Topper
A spineless jellyfish who could never have suffered broken vertebrae.

Re: Bertuzzi/Moore

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:16 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
Topper wrote:A spineless jellyfish who could never have suffered broken vertebrae.
as in broke invertebrate?

Re: Bertuzzi/Moore

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:53 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
dhabums wrote:
Fred wrote:I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...

For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?

I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?

I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?

I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision
Reasons for judgment, not that it will likely get that far.

The court uses the evidence provided.

Personal injury claims often take years.

Because it was filed in Ontario.

Look what the cat dragged in. 8-)