Looks like Moore money for the team formally known as The Orcas
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/h ... le2312475/
Bertuzzi/Moore
Moderator: Referees
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
I love every move Jim Benning makes
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...
For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?
I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?
I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?
I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision
For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?
I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?
I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?
I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision
cheers
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Reasons for judgment, not that it will likely get that far.Fred wrote:I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...
For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?
I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?
I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?
I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision
The court uses the evidence provided.
Personal injury claims often take years.
Because it was filed in Ontario.
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Why does this story always rear it's ugly head when there is hockey in the air (Playoffs, draft, free-agency, start of season).
http://www.thestar.com/sports/hockey/nh ... -struggles
I don't believe it for a minute.
Something stinks to high heaven here.
I think he is milking this as a way to a cool 60 million as opposed to working hard to overcome all the odds and have a career
Steve Moore you are a coward and a pansy and your name will forever be etched in shame if you continue this route...get a real job and suck it the fuck up...
http://www.thestar.com/sports/hockey/nh ... -struggles
I don't believe it for a minute.
Something stinks to high heaven here.
I think he is milking this as a way to a cool 60 million as opposed to working hard to overcome all the odds and have a career
Steve Moore you are a coward and a pansy and your name will forever be etched in shame if you continue this route...get a real job and suck it the fuck up...
I love every move Jim Benning makes
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
A spineless jellyfish who could never have suffered broken vertebrae.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 26224
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
as in broke invertebrate?Topper wrote:A spineless jellyfish who could never have suffered broken vertebrae.
If you need air...call it in
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31146
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
dhabums wrote:Reasons for judgment, not that it will likely get that far.Fred wrote:I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...
For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?
I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?
I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?
I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision
The court uses the evidence provided.
Personal injury claims often take years.
Because it was filed in Ontario.
Look what the cat dragged in.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”