Moderator: Referees
ClamRussel wrote:You think it will keep going? I know it seems that way, but it did in '95 as well....it seemed hopeless then all of a sudden they emerge w/ a deal out of the blue. It does seem bleak.

feritflame wrote:I doubt seriously doubt that the NHL will base his suspension on when Moore gets back on the ice



6 - The Avs will be gunning for him (hopefully )

Vegas_Nucks_Fan wrote:I think he's paid his dues.
1 - He's lost a shitload of money
2 - He's lost a lot of respect from players and fans and propspective bosses.
3 - He couldn't help us in the playoffs when we needed him most
4 - See 3 ^ - he cost the team a shitload of money
5 - He'll never see the big endorsement deals
6 - The Avs will be gunning for him (hopefully)
7 - He still has to worry about Moore and his civil suit
8 - He cried in public
How much more does a guy have to pay for one truly messed up mistake? When the league plays again he better be suiting up. Leave it to Moore to decide if he needs to be punished more?
oh yeah - 1 more
9 - He showed what joke the league and the media are

ClamRussel wrote:The NHL has NEVER done that. Suspensions have always been based on the act & results not recovery time. However, there has never been a suspension this long before either. The McSorley thing was different because he was a bum skating into retirement & Bettman was happy enough just to get rid of him. Here we're talking about one of the NHLs top stars. Anyone know if he lost his Gatorade deal?

(when was the last time we saw one?)...


Users browsing this forum: the Dogsalmon, x00x and 9 guests