lil-scarface wrote:i disagree considering if we lose ohlund we are also losing salo next season, so couldnt you use salo instead because he has trade value also, plus hes injured half thhe time. i love both ohlund and salo but id rather see salo go.
SRsez wrote:Okay, put down the pipe, son. You simply don't trade one of the top 10 d men in the league, unless his wife hates Edmonton or something.
Tukaram wrote:I wouldn't. Scoring forwards are easier to come by than quality defensemen, and a team can never have too many of those.
The Canucks already have scoring forwards; they just need to loosen the grips on their sticks a little bit.
Linden Is God wrote:this thread is garbage
levelheaded wrote:Yes, because it makes tons of sense trading our best defender who makes considerably less then market value for short term offensive help...
magnum44 wrote:i'd rather hang on for awhile and trade salo for some picks and prospects since we can't afford to put more money into our D.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], rockalt, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests