Okay, everyone agrees that $1.9 is way too much, but there are still some here that can't grasp the concept that a 2nd rounder is too little.
So which is worse? Kesler is a 1st round pick. If that's what we'd get back, then I'd have no problem with taking a gamble and letting him go, but to let him fly for 45th-55th overall pick is insane. There is way too much potential to let him go.
Joker wrote:That's sheer genius. Give him the 'C', tell him he's the future of our hockey club and with his huge paycheque, comes huge responsibilities.
Lots of ice time against the best players in the league will either make him great, or break him down so we can sign him next year for peanuts.
Is that a lame attempt of facetiousness? What are you, the new moron in from Calphuck?
Tant wrote:Personally if they match the offer I hope they play the hell out of Kesler. Put him on the top two lines and hope he earns his paycheque.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Oh wait, I did. Geez, we must be idiots, with no hockey knowledge at all, huh Tant?
Dang wrote: For once I must agree with SR sez
For once, you finally smartened up?
Kesler's upside is too high. Nonis dropped the ball by not getting him signed earlier. Oh well, water under the bridge. This is the year we find out whether he can be the guy his supporters say he can be. And next year there's always release, trade, arbitration, and guys we can pick off Clarke's roster.
It's done.