Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 9493
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by Topper » Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:21 pm

Common practice on Jamaica was to cram a bunch of weed into a bottle of rum and let it sit for weeks before drinking. I'm sure you could do the same with gin.
Last edited by Topper on Tue Jun 26, 2018 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 12634
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:39 pm

Note to self:

Try Tops recipe.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
5thhorseman
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by 5thhorseman » Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:49 am

I'm positive that recipe would kill me. Why not toss a few scotch bonnets in there while you are at it :twisted:

User avatar
Uncle dans leg
CC Legend
Posts: 4452
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by Uncle dans leg » Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:09 am

A few years ago the wife got an idea for xmas gifts to make her own vanilla extract which is basically vodka with vanilla beans in there for 3 or 4 months... of course i had to try it with some bud. It was unreal.
nobody forks...with the jesus

User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 9493
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by Topper » Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:32 am

5thhorseman wrote:
Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:49 am
I'm positive that recipe would kill me. Why not toss a few scotch bonnets in there while you are at it :twisted:
A winery near Oliver, Silver Sage, sell a desert wine with a pepper of some sort in the bottle. Perfect gift for someone you don't like.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.

User avatar
Tiger
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by Tiger » Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:39 am

Cherry Picker wrote:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:25 am
I’ve been 19 for years.
I'm a Korean war vet..ya snot nosed punks..
" You're only young once - but can be immature forever "
" If you cant beat them in the alley - you can't beat them on the ice

ESQ
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by ESQ » Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:27 pm

I've heard the Canucks Army guy on the radio a bunch, and I was really impressed at the depth of his research heading into the draft.

Here's his take on Hughes.Here's my favourite excerpt:
Some people might look at Hughes’ small stature and reputation as a dynamic offensive player and assume he has deficiencies on the defensive side of the game. They would be wrong. While his occasional turnovers make him riskier in the neutral zone than his peers and his small frame can result in struggles to win puck battles at times, Hughes’ defending is excellent. His speed makes him a tenacious and dedicated backchecker, and he has an active stick which he uses to break up passing plays. As you might expect, his speed and puck skills also mean that once he regains possession, the puck doesn’t stay in his own zone for long.
I think what impresses me most about Hughes is that he was the youngest player in the NCAA and was dominant (started at 16 and 10 months, playing against 21-22 year olds), and also that he was on the ice for one goal against at the WCs (the only South Korea goal in a 13-1 stomping). I think that's a truly remarkable feat for the youngest player in the tournament.

DHA
CC Veteran
Posts: 163
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 5:04 pm

Re: Canucks 2018 Draft Review

Post by DHA » Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:37 pm

ESQ wrote:
Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:27 pm
I've heard the Canucks Army guy on the radio a bunch, and I was really impressed at the depth of his research heading into the draft.

Here's his take on Hughes.Here's my favourite excerpt:
Some people might look at Hughes’ small stature and reputation as a dynamic offensive player and assume he has deficiencies on the defensive side of the game. They would be wrong. While his occasional turnovers make him riskier in the neutral zone than his peers and his small frame can result in struggles to win puck battles at times, Hughes’ defending is excellent. His speed makes him a tenacious and dedicated backchecker, and he has an active stick which he uses to break up passing plays. As you might expect, his speed and puck skills also mean that once he regains possession, the puck doesn’t stay in his own zone for long.
I think what impresses me most about Hughes is that he was the youngest player in the NCAA and was dominant (started at 16 and 10 months, playing against 21-22 year olds), and also that he was on the ice for one goal against at the WCs (the only South Korea goal in a 13-1 stomping). I think that's a truly remarkable feat for the youngest player in the tournament.
As much as guys like Dobson an Buchard have the tools to be fantastic rearguards - Hughes skill set on the back end is extremely rare commodity in the league. You need your shut down heavy players, but when you need a goal or your PP is jumping the boards You will be able to count on one hand the guys in the league that can do what he can. Detroit got lucky but Canucks got the harder asset to trade for and a rare gem.

Post Reply