Trades made - Trade Deadline Day 2018

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:57 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess

Well maybe there were no takers?

Motte:

22

5'10

In AHL

C/LW

Jokinnen:

C/LW/RW

UFA July 1st


Shannon just reported trade not confirmed as to players. Perhaps Jokinnen who has a MTC .......
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 22003
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Trades made

Post by Strangelove » Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:59 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.
Motte doesn't have to go through waivers until after he plays 80 NHL games.

And Lipstick would probably clear if he fails to make the team next year (one-way contract next year).
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!

User avatar
Jovocop
CC Legend
Posts: 3750
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Jovocop » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess
If 26 years old Kane can only get a conditional 1st (only if he re-signs with the Sharks, else 2nd in 2019), a 24 years old 5'10" centre, and a fourth rounder in 2020, I am not sure what we can expect for 34 years old Vanek. The market is clearly not favoring the seller this deadline.

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 22003
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Trades made

Post by Strangelove » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm

Jovocop wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:35 pm
Here are the details:
Pierre LeBrun‏@PierreVLeBrun

Here's the condition of the first-round 2019 pick in the Evander Kane deal: if the Sharks re-sign Kane, it's a first; but if Kane walks into free agency, it's a second-round pick in 2019
OOooo I like it... Sharks more likely to let him walk, Nucks more likely to have a shot at him as a UFA. :mex:
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!

User avatar
Meds
CC Legend
Posts: 6731
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Meds » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm

Jovocop wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess
If 26 years old Kane can only get a conditional 1st (only if he re-signs with the Sharks, else 2nd in 2019), a 24 years old 5'10" centre, and a fourth rounder in 2020, I am not sure what we can expect for 34 years old Vanek. The market is clearly not favoring the seller this deadline.
Then keep Vanek.

Vanek > Jokinen

We don’t need another small AHL player.

It’s shit like this that makes people question Benning.

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:06 pm

Joorish to Pens

Tatar to Vegas.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Jovocop
CC Legend
Posts: 3750
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Jovocop » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:07 pm

Meds wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm
Jovocop wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess
If 26 years old Kane can only get a conditional 1st (only if he re-signs with the Sharks, else 2nd in 2019), a 24 years old 5'10" centre, and a fourth rounder in 2020, I am not sure what we can expect for 34 years old Vanek. The market is clearly not favoring the seller this deadline.
Then keep Vanek.

Vanek > Jokinen

We don’t need another small AHL player.

It’s shit like this that makes people question Benning.
Give the kid a chance before writing him off...

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:08 pm

Meds wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm
Jovocop wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess
If 26 years old Kane can only get a conditional 1st (only if he re-signs with the Sharks, else 2nd in 2019), a 24 years old 5'10" centre, and a fourth rounder in 2020, I am not sure what we can expect for 34 years old Vanek. The market is clearly not favoring the seller this deadline.
Then keep Vanek.

Vanek > Jokinen

We don’t need another small AHL player.

It’s shit like this that makes people question Benning.

Oh Christ! If he didn't trade Vanek you'd be all over him like flies to shit.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:08 pm

McDonagh to Tampa
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Jovocop
CC Legend
Posts: 3750
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Jovocop » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:12 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:08 pm
Meds wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm
Jovocop wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess
If 26 years old Kane can only get a conditional 1st (only if he re-signs with the Sharks, else 2nd in 2019), a 24 years old 5'10" centre, and a fourth rounder in 2020, I am not sure what we can expect for 34 years old Vanek. The market is clearly not favoring the seller this deadline.
Then keep Vanek.

Vanek > Jokinen

We don’t need another small AHL player.

It’s shit like this that makes people question Benning.

Oh Christ! If he didn't trade Vanek you'd be all over him like flies to shit.
:D :lol:

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:13 pm

Christ, Vegas gives up a 1st, 2nd and 3rd for Tatar.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Reefer2
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5027
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:47 am

Re: Trades made

Post by Reefer2 » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:13 pm

Meds wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm
Jovocop wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess
If 26 years old Kane can only get a conditional 1st (only if he re-signs with the Sharks, else 2nd in 2019), a 24 years old 5'10" centre, and a fourth rounder in 2020, I am not sure what we can expect for 34 years old Vanek. The market is clearly not favoring the seller this deadline.
Then keep Vanek.

Vanek > Jokinen

We don’t need another small AHL player.

It’s shit like this that makes people question Benning.
the whole deal looks like something Bennnig did just to say he traded Vanek. It was a damned if you do and damned if you don't option for Vanek. Seems he had minimal to no trade value so what was Benning supposed to get for him?

Maybe a better option would of been to sign him for another year unless it was felt that he was taking a position from a young guy.

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:14 pm

NYR/Tampa deal said to be massive!?!?!

Maroon to Devils for a 3rd
Last edited by Hockey Widow on Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:15 pm

Reefer2 wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:13 pm
Meds wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm
Jovocop wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:53 pm
Why not take a 4th or 5th ? You are already doing CBJ a favour by taking Jokinnen. Makes little sense. Both these little guys acquired today have to clear waivers next year.

Garbage out and garbage in I guess
If 26 years old Kane can only get a conditional 1st (only if he re-signs with the Sharks, else 2nd in 2019), a 24 years old 5'10" centre, and a fourth rounder in 2020, I am not sure what we can expect for 34 years old Vanek. The market is clearly not favoring the seller this deadline.
Then keep Vanek.

Vanek > Jokinen

We don’t need another small AHL player.

It’s shit like this that makes people question Benning.
the whole deal looks like something Bennnig did just to say he traded Vanek. It was a damned if you do and damned if you don't option for Vanek. Seems he had minimal to no trade value so what was Benning supposed to get for him?

Maybe a better option would of been to sign him for another year unless it was felt that he was taking a position from a young guy.
He could still sign Vanek
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15131
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Trades made

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:16 pm

Calgary gets Shore
The only HW the Canucks need

Post Reply