Canucks Young Guns

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
The Brown Wizard
CC Legend
Posts: 8910
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by The Brown Wizard » Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:22 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:18 pm
The Brown Wizard wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:14 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:11 pm
. It is amusing the hate Stecher gets though.
Thats just the way she goes when they suck Gravy
He’s the team’s sixth D man. I’d be more concerned that the bottom two lines can’t sustain ANY pressure in the other teams end. Lines 3 and 4 are getting murdered out there so far.
This is the best Jake has looked in vancouver. Hes assertive and snarly.

Not sure whats up with Ferkland...still hasnt been much of a factor.

Gaudette I've liked but coach is parking him next game

Sutter Beagle and Schaller have been mediocre i will agree
Witchcraft... Oh, but it IS. A dark and terrible magic...

User avatar
Hank
CC Legend
Posts: 3945
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Hank » Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:27 pm

The Brown Wizard wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:14 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:11 pm
. It is amusing the hate Stecher gets though.
Thats just the way she goes when they suck Gravy
Has nothing to do with hate. They want Nikita back and there is some hearsay as this is an option that management might be looking at. A healthy Tanev is obviously a greater asset than Stecher, but if this team is starting to contend for playoffs, extending Tanev like they did with Edler makes sense.

If it's down to having the 6'7" Russian and one of Tanev and Stecher, I'm buying Trojan a Compass card to get to the airport himself.
Try to focus on THIS year...

User avatar
Doyle Hargraves
CC Legend
Posts: 16283
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Doyle Hargraves » Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:30 pm

Hank wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:27 pm
The Brown Wizard wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:14 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:11 pm
. It is amusing the hate Stecher gets though.
Thats just the way she goes when they suck Gravy
Has nothing to do with hate. They want Nikita back and there is some hearsay as this is an option that management might be looking at. A healthy Tanev is obviously a greater asset than Stecher, but if this team is starting to contend for playoffs, extending Tanev like they did with Edler makes sense.

If it's down to having the 6'7" Russian and one of Tanev and Stecher, I'm buying Trojan a Compass card to get to the airport himself.
Tryamkin is probably a better player than Stecher but he will want some pretty good jack to even think about coming back. And he also didn’t like his ice time last time. So he’s gonna like being on the third pair again? And if they are in a race they aren’t trading Tanev. And alas where is the cap room coming from this season?
“ROR IS OVERRATED, MACKINNON IS A BUM, TAVARES IS DONE”

User avatar
5thhorseman
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by 5thhorseman » Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:36 pm

Not getting #88 will probably be enough to put him off.

User avatar
Hank
CC Legend
Posts: 3945
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Hank » Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:41 pm

Who knows man? I'm just reading all this stuff that Tryamkin is interested in coming back and the two sides are talking.

It's obviously for next season and it would be crazy for management not to start thinking about how they would do this. Yeah, they're not moving Tanev if they're contending for the wildcard. I have no idea if he's matured, if he's willing to play behind Myers and Tanev, who needs to move to gain cap, etc.

If it can be done, I'm all for it because that D with Tryamkin (minus a current Dman) would be pretty amazing.
5thhorseman wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:36 pm
Not getting #88 will probably be enough to put him off.
That would be the stupidest deal-breaker ever :lol:

Maybe the move Tanev, give #8 to Gaudette (his college number) and hand #88 to the big baby.
Try to focus on THIS year...

User avatar
dangler
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1286
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 5:31 pm
Location: Commercial Drive Coffee shop

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by dangler » Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:27 pm

Hank wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:41 pm
Who knows man? I'm just reading all this stuff that Tryamkin is interested in coming back and the two sides are talking.

It's obviously for next season and it would be crazy for management not to start thinking about how they would do this. Yeah, they're not moving Tanev if they're contending for the wildcard. I have no idea if he's matured, if he's willing to play behind Myers and Tanev, who needs to move to gain cap, etc.

If it can be done, I'm all for it because that D with Tryamkin (minus a current Dman) would be pretty amazing.
5thhorseman wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:36 pm
Not getting #88 will probably be enough to put him off.
That would be the stupidest deal-breaker ever :lol:

Maybe the move Tanev, give #8 to Gaudette (his college number) and hand #88 to the big baby.
People are over rating Tryamkin, he was healthy scratched last season in the K.
If he really wants to return,great! But i doubt Jimbro will give him a 1-way contract.
He's going to have to make the team on merit this time.
Loui is tougher to get rid of than ear hair

User avatar
Chef Boi RD
CC Legend
Posts: 15822
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Chef Boi RD » Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:52 pm

Jimbro has some good D-men waiting in the wings in Juolevi, Tryamkin and Woo. All 3 will be pushing for jobs next season. Juolevi this season, Tryamkin next season. Woo may need cooking in the A. I’m timing his arrival with Podkozlin.

Madden was close to leaving college this summer, Canucks will sign Lockwood next summer. Hoglander will arrive next training camp


Benning - Genius!!
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate

ESQ
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2579
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by ESQ » Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:26 pm

The Brown Wizard wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:10 pm

He should bump stretcher out of the lineup. Thats a much stronger looking 6 dmen i have to say
Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:11 pm
It is amusing the hate Stecher gets though.
Hyperbole-much? I'm not really seeing the hate.

User avatar
Doyle Hargraves
CC Legend
Posts: 16283
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Doyle Hargraves » Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:59 pm

ESQ wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:26 pm
The Brown Wizard wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:10 pm

He should bump stretcher out of the lineup. Thats a much stronger looking 6 dmen i have to say
Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:11 pm
It is amusing the hate Stecher gets though.
Hyperbole-much? I'm not really seeing the hate.
He takes a pretty good beating in the GDT’s. I don’t plan to look it up and post a bunch of quotes. Then again there was a poster in the GDT saying that Baertschi scored at a 60 point pace..... not sure if that was hyperbole or just piss poor math. :lol:
Last edited by Doyle Hargraves on Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“ROR IS OVERRATED, MACKINNON IS A BUM, TAVARES IS DONE”

User avatar
Todd Bersnoozi
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2513
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Todd Bersnoozi » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:01 pm

The Brown Wizard wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:10 pm
He should bump stretcher out of the lineup. Thats a much stronger looking 6 dmen i have to say
I'd much prefer Tryamkin over Stech going into the playoffs. A bottom pairing of Benn-Tryamkin would be great. They can throw their weight around and be tuff to play against.

Hank wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:34 pm
TBH, I would extend Tanev (if he can prove he can stay healthy) and look to trade Stecher. Can Tree play for us this season as soon as he's finished the KHL? Now, that would be a monster of a 6-man D-corp.
If we extend Tan-man, I think he would have to take a paycut and sign short-term like Edler. I think we'll be lucky to get 60 games out of him, but maybe playing with Hughes is the tonic he needs for a healthy season. Maybe when Hughes is on the ice, we'll have much better possession time, so we're not defending the whole time and Tanev is not taking hits and blocking shots all nite.

The free agent crop seems to be getting better and cheaper every year though. I'd have a long hard look at who might be available b4 extending Tanev. I won't mind looking at another guy who is a right-shot D who may be not as good, but is more durable, younger, cheaper with some upside.

User avatar
micky107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9863
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by micky107 » Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:54 pm

Nothing is happening till we make more cap space. It's so tight, nobodies getting in. :wow:
I'm done listening or taking seriously any Triampkin talk till he's actually skating in a Canuck training camp.
"evolution"

ESQ
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2579
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by ESQ » Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:14 pm

Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:59 pm
Then again there was a poster in the GDT saying that Baertschi scored at a 60 point pace..... not sure if that was hyperbole or just piss poor math. :lol:
....ya ya ya.

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 22232
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Strangelove » Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:16 pm

dangler wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:27 pm
People are over rating Tryamkin, he was healthy scratched last season in the K.
You must be thinking of when he was healthy scratched with the National team (16 months ago).
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!

User avatar
Doyle Hargraves
CC Legend
Posts: 16283
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by Doyle Hargraves » Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:24 pm

ESQ wrote:
Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:14 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote:
Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:59 pm
Then again there was a poster in the GDT saying that Baertschi scored at a 60 point pace..... not sure if that was hyperbole or just piss poor math. :lol:
....ya ya ya.
:) ;)
“ROR IS OVERRATED, MACKINNON IS A BUM, TAVARES IS DONE”

ESQ
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2579
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Canucks Young Guns

Post by ESQ » Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:13 pm

Welp, the comets are looking as dominant as expected.

Post Reply