I was thinking 4th line and the need for a heavyweight, especially with the insertion of youth into the lineup...He's a 3rd liner, and we kinds have the 3rd line covered
Take care...
Moderator: Referees
I was thinking 4th line and the need for a heavyweight, especially with the insertion of youth into the lineup...He's a 3rd liner, and we kinds have the 3rd line covered
Okposo does seem to be a guy Benning would be all over. This one would not surprise me at all.Tciso wrote:He's a 3rd liner, and we kinds have the 3rd line covered...so...while I like his size, and he is cheap, he doesn't really address our need for a quality top 6 forward. I'm not sold on Looch either. Brower or Okposo seem better options for our needs.rikster wrote:Come July 1st, I don't expect to see any of the top UFA's finding their way to Vancouver and given the talk that the market for them is over heated I think they should take a back seat...
But the player I do hope they can sign is Matt Martin from the Islanders...
Brings a lot of what Lucic does but at a fraction of the cost...
Girardi is 32 and Gudbranson is 24. I will take Gudbranson over Girardi and McCann any day.Hockey Widow wrote: Just think, we could have had Girardi and still kept McCann.
gobi wrote:Pretty difficult to assess which is the better deal (Giraldi vs Gudbranson) without knowing what Giraldi would have cost. Besides, as mentioned, Gudbranson is much younger.
One more reason for Asshole Benning to sign Lucic.SKYO wrote: Kuzma just reported... looks like if the Oilers land Lucic they will trade their mighty Taylor Hall (one of the best younger LW in the league) for dman Hamonic
I'm hearing the Rags wanted McCann + 2nd.Hockey Widow wrote:Agreed. Don't know the acquisition cost. Gotta imagine though that it would not have been a cap dump by Rangers.gobi wrote:Pretty difficult to assess which is the better deal (Giraldi vs Gudbranson) without knowing what Giraldi would have cost. Besides, as mentioned, Gudbranson is much younger.
Unless the Rags were taking Higgins and Burrows from us I'm taking Guds 99 times out of 100 compared to Girardi. Even if they were I think i still like a 24 year old Gudbranson knowing what we gave up to get him!Hockey Widow wrote:gobi wrote:Pretty difficult to assess which is the better deal (Giraldi vs Gudbranson) without knowing what Giraldi would have cost. Besides, as mentioned, Gudbranson is much younger.
Agreed. Don't know the acquisition cost. Gotta imagine though that it would not have been a cap dump by Rangers.
I dunno, I hear from hardcore Oiler fans that Hall is not dedicated to the game of hockey.Island Nucklehead wrote:Hall for Hamonic would be a steal for the Islanders.