Yeahno I keep telling you that there is plenty of excellent objective evidence availableRonning's Ghost wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:26 pmWhat I have been trying to do is to bring you around the the idea of objective criteria, but it seems that you're not into it, and it's boring some other posters.Strangelove wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:26 pm
You have been working hard around here trying to reach some kind of a... consensus
... as to when folks should feel free to proclaim him a genius.
... and you keep trying set a consensus for "genius".
Wins = genius was so funny!
Not nearly as funny thought as stating The Great Strangelove is boring!!!
But seriously...
If you feel this subject is "boring some other posters" (and it is) why do YOU keep pushing me to talk about it?
Gracious, you've been hounding me about this with your "we" stuff for TWO YEARS.
So I'll be more unhappy than you if MY Canucks don't have playoff success?Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:26 pmIf I don't get this evidence, you will be more unhappy about it than I will, because it will mean that either the Canucks haven't had any playoff success, or Benning is no longer the GM.Strangelove wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:26 pm Listen, I hope one day you get all the data/evidence you need Cliffy
... but that's not my problem brother.
Sounds about right.
Maybe but hey it definitely became "Cliffy's stated requirements" andRonning's Ghost wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:26 pmHey, it was Royal Dude who introduced the whole "Masterpiece defines the genius" concept. The lowest threshold I proposed for consideration http://canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtop ... =2&t=10898 was Conference Finals by 2020.Strangelove wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:02 pm
BTW what I predicted to happen in 1-2 years won't be enough to meet Cliffy's stated requirements...
... OMG that is YOUR THREAD from 2 years ago... you're the OP!!
Thanks for proving my overriding point there Cliffy, you hound dog.