RoyalDude wrote:duh didn't they just change the lottery format last week for next years draft? All non playoff teams will have the same chance of winning the lottery? I may have read it wrong. If true, it would make tanking meaningless unless they are trying to avoid making the playoffs, in which is a given
RoyalDude wrote:Again, Canuck fans are obsessed with going backwards. I'd be all in if its a short term contract considering his age, like 2 years max. Just don't see that happening. Also the Erhoff now is nit the Erhoff of 2011
Torts 'we need to stop talking about 2011'
herb wrote:Sign Jovo, Salo, Mitchell and Ehrhoff. Get the band back together!!
Hockey Widow wrote:Tough call on Ehrhoff. Picking him up would go against everything the Canucks are trying to do. He doesn't make them younger. He doesn't make them harder to play against. He does add skill and offence. Given that they are banking on Edler to be their go to guy on defence, yes, Ehrhoff would assist in that but at the cost of Tanev? They also project Sbisa to be in the top 4 in the next year or two.
They could make room for him roster wise by moving one of Stanton or Corrado, both of whom are younger. Hard call, I see merits either way.
Strangelove wrote:sagebrush wrote:We need meat & potatoe guys, not cream puffs.
“We didn’t like his compete level in the playoffs” - MG
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], isle_nuck and 5 guests