Page 2 of 44

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:45 am
by Diehard1
Does Bettman have to call Jacobs, his boss, and ask if he ca suspend Lucic? There's no way a Bruin gets suspended for anything less than attempted murder. They broke a guy's back and it wasn't even a penalty.

Good to see Detroit giving Boston a good run, also great to see the Habs doing well. Hopefully a few of the other favourites can go out so I will have somebody to cheer for. As is, I don't really care who wins, more cheering against certain teams.

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:17 am
by ClamRussel
Aaaaaaas we suspected:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=449825

Joke

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:22 am
by ClamRussel
http://www.tsn.ca/VideoHub/?collection=72&show=328020

For such a tough guy he sure can't take a hit.

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:33 am
by Chef Boi RD
That's the difference maker for me why I don't want to emulate the Bruins, they are tough yes, but they are a bunch of babies. It's ok for them to play you hard but when you hit them hard back, they can't take it. It still amazes me how the Canucks are so hated yet the bruins play cheapest and dirtiest hockey in the game but as soon as u play that way back at them you get the penalty. I really can't stand them. It doesn't help that they are beloved by Cherry and the eastern hockey media. How dare we criticize an original 6 team?

One play yesterday where the class act Datsyuk stripped the puck off of Chara, You could see that Chara wanted to go after him for it like the nerve of Datsyuk to do that to Zdeno. I am so sick of Marchands post whistle antics. Yet they somehow get away with it. Well, they say the Boston owner is the most powerful owner in the league

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:39 am
by ClamRussel
RoyalDude wrote:That's the difference maker for me why I don't want to emulate the Bruins, they are tough yes, but they are a bunch of babies. It's ok for them to play you hard but when you hit them hard back, they can't take it. It still amazes me how the Canucks are so hated yet the bruins play cheapest and dirtiest hockey in the game but as soon as u play that way back at them you get the penalty. I really can't stand them. It doesn't help that they are beloved by Cherry and the eastern hockey media. How dare we criticize an original 6 team?

One play yesterday where the class act Datsyuk stripped the puck off of Chara, You could see that Chara wanted to go after him for it like the nerve of Datsyuk to do that to Zdeno. I am so sick of Marchands post whistle antics. Yet they somehow get away with it. Well, they say the Boston owner is the most powerful owner in the league
The problem is the Bruins are protected. If a team like the Canucks played like that they'd be in the box all game and suspended half the year for "poor angles" and the like. Remember how the boys came out hard against the Sharks & Kings and spent half the games in the box for "stupid penalties" yet the Bruins play exactly that way and they are "tough and hard to play against".

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:42 pm
by ClamRussel
...yet the NHL deems this as 5x worse an infraction than the Lucic crotch spear.


Lucic $5k no suspension

Quenneville $25k

Shows where their priorities and their head is at.

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:49 pm
by Cornuck
Geez Clam - I respect your passion for the game, but you're going to have aneurysm trying to make sense of the NHL's reffing and discipline systems. :?

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:52 pm
by ClamRussel
Cornuck wrote:Geez Clam - I respect your passion for the game, but you're going to have aneurysm trying to make sense of the NHL's reffing and discipline systems. :?
Thanks cornuck, I should really take a deep breath.... "serenity nowwww"

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:17 pm
by BurningBeard
ClamRussel wrote:Aaaaaaas we suspected:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=449825

Joke
Are they actually fining him $5000 for "spearing"? I don't understand why they'd admit it's a spear. A spear is a game, so if they're saying it's a spear that wasn't called, he should get a game for it. I presumed they wouldn't fine him at all, or fine him for "slashing".

This is a text book example for the argument that the instigator rule doesn't work. In general I'm not against the instigator rule, but it only works if the league is going to police the game instead. If they're not, you need to let the players do it. There would have been retribution against Lucic the next shift if it weren't for the instigator, and that's what should have happened. I don't even think a suspension is necessary if Lucic "pays for his sins" the next shift.

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:40 pm
by ClamRussel
BurningBeard wrote:Are they actually fining him $5000 for "spearing"? I don't understand why they'd admit it's a spear. A spear is a game, so if they're saying it's a spear that wasn't called, he should get a game for it. I presumed they wouldn't fine him at all, or fine him for "slashing".

This is a text book example for the argument that the instigator rule doesn't work. In general I'm not against the instigator rule, but it only works if the league is going to police the game instead. If they're not, you need to let the players do it. There would have been retribution against Lucic the next shift if it weren't for the instigator, and that's what should have happened. I don't even think a suspension is necessary if Lucic "pays for his sins" the next shift.
Yep, they're calling it spearing all right.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=715505

What is comical is TSN's headline that Lucic is "paying the price" as if he'll even notice it. That'll learn 'im

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:50 pm
by SKYO
holycrappola!

Check out Seabrook's hit to Backes head!

Image

Concussion without a doubt, cause it's playoffs more leeway, so he'll only get like 3 games instead of the 5.

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:18 pm
by ClamRussel
Holy shitzen! Shades of Torres.

Well, playoffs didn't stop the NHL from throwing the book at Rome for a far lesser hit imo. BUT, this is Seabrook and he plays for the Hawks so they'll go easy on him. I'd be shocked if Backes isn't done for the season after that one. That hit pretty much cost the Hawks the game.

If that hit was on Burrows there would be no suspension. If that hit was delivered by Edler it would be 10 games, if it was Kassian it would be the rest of playoffs. Ya, Seabrook probably gets 3.

Backes didn't even have the puck.

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:22 pm
by SKYO
suspension for sure there clam...

Wow Blues win it! in OT!

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:36 pm
by BurningBeard
The Chicago / St. Louis series has been great, and I'm not just saying that because St. Louis is up 2-0. The stick work on display would make Billy Smith blush. Refs really need to keep a handle on things, the teams already hated each other before the hit on Backes. Series is a powder keg waiting to go off. Great action though, very entertaining.

Re: 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:54 pm
by BurningBeard
I can't describe how happy I was to see the CBC added Kadri to the panel. Finally someone representing the Maple leaves can present their opinion, and we can keep things fair and balanced.