I read that post and realized it was a bad day to quit drinking, so here goes:RyanGinger wrote:2013-14 TRADE DEADLINE
1) TRADE – TO WPG: RICHARDSON, HANSEN, BOOTH, WELSH, WEISE, 2nd
````````````````TO VAN: KANE blah, blah, blah.
Nope it stil doesn't make sense, not for us nor for Winterpeg. We give up too much depth for one player and the Jets would want an impact player for Kane, none of which is being offered.
The second proposal, excuse me for a second, I may be able to express my feelings about it now. where is the puke smilie, one is needed here.
You are essentially offering up 4 1st round picks or the equivalent for Johannsen, a 24th overall pick in the 2009 draft that has never scored 50 points in any level of hockey, I might put up that package for Kane if Gaunce or the 1st were take out.
And how can "SCHROEDER/ALBERTS/TOMMERNES" even be an option as if these three have remotely the same relative value?
Please tell me RyanGinger are you a flames or leaves fan as I cannot conceive of any Canucks fan proposing this crap.