Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
Moderator: Referees
- Doyle Hargraves
- MVP
- Posts: 20617
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
Paused you have the iq of a fucking shoehorn . 25 million over 16 years is chump change to the wops. Will they buy him out ? I'm not sure but they should because a trade will hambone the franchise for years when he packs it in early . I know the mods at hf let you have your little piss parties there and protect your sorry ass but you may not receive the same protection here. Prongers situation has fuck all to do with this mess . If there is a way out of this I am all ears but I haven't seen one yet . Either way Roberto won't be here for the long term
“Gohmert and Bumpty sitting in a tree”
-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:21 pm
- Location: Surrey, BC
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
LOL buddy I'm not the guy who's talking about buying out a franchise goalie who has a great caphit, leaving us with no starting goalie. Herp derp durrr let's buyout our franchise goalie derp.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Paused you have the iq of a fucking shoehorn . 25 million over 16 years is chump change to the wops. Will they buy him out ? I'm not sure but they should because a trade will hambone the franchise for years when he packs it in early . I know the mods at hf let you have your little piss parties there and protect your sorry ass but you may not receive the same protection here. Prongers situation has fuck all to do with this mess . If there is a way out of this I am all ears but I haven't seen one yet . Either way Roberto won't be here for the long term
- Doyle Hargraves
- MVP
- Posts: 20617
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
No you are the mongoloid who doesn't understand how to read. The cap hit is fine tard, it's the future penalties that make him tough to move ..... Kinda like how you find it tough to understand common sense . Moron .
“Gohmert and Bumpty sitting in a tree”
-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:21 pm
- Location: Surrey, BC
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
I could care less what would make him "tough to move." I don't see why we should be moving him at all. It's also funny how you've resorted to childish name-calling since responding to my post earlier. It was a stupid suggestion to begin with...why you heff to be mad?Blob Mckenzie wrote:No you are the mongoloid who doesn't understand how to read. The cap hit is fine tard, it's the future penalties that make him tough to move ..... Kinda like how you find it tough to understand common sense . Moron .
- Doyle Hargraves
- MVP
- Posts: 20617
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
No it wasn't a stupid suggestion . It is something that should and will likely be considered . You are too thick to look at the long term and just parrot the same diatribe over and over again. I believe you sir started the name calling but I should have probably taken the high road considering your lack of reading comprehension .
“Gohmert and Bumpty sitting in a tree”
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
Fight Fight Fight!
*get's the popcorn*
*get's the popcorn*
I love every move Jim Benning makes 

-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:21 pm
- Location: Surrey, BC
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
It shouldn't and won't be considered. If we were going to buyout Luongo we wouldn't have traded Schneider. I don't care what the cap penalties MIGHT be, because we can't say for certain we will ever be hit with a penalty.Blob Mckenzie wrote:No it wasn't a stupid suggestion . It is something that should and will likely be considered . You are too thick to look at the long term and just parrot the same diatribe over and over again. I believe you sir started the name calling but I should have probably taken the high road considering your lack of reading comprehension .
Re-signing the Sedins, then buying out your franchise goalie...the two moves don't mix.
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
I hope you get paid to post on behalf of Roberto.The_Pauser wrote:It shouldn't and won't be considered. If we were going to buyout Luongo we wouldn't have traded Schneider. I don't care what the cap penalties MIGHT be, because we can't say for certain we will ever be hit with a penalty.Blob Mckenzie wrote:No it wasn't a stupid suggestion . It is something that should and will likely be considered . You are too thick to look at the long term and just parrot the same diatribe over and over again. I believe you sir started the name calling but I should have probably taken the high road considering your lack of reading comprehension .
Re-signing the Sedins, then buying out your franchise goalie...the two moves don't mix.
-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:21 pm
- Location: Surrey, BC
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
Hey if you want to cheer for a team with no goalie go cheer for Winnipeg, or Edmonton, or Calgary. They'll tell you how good life is when you don't have a goalie.dhabums wrote:I hope you get paid to post on behalf of Roberto.The_Pauser wrote:It shouldn't and won't be considered. If we were going to buyout Luongo we wouldn't have traded Schneider. I don't care what the cap penalties MIGHT be, because we can't say for certain we will ever be hit with a penalty.Blob Mckenzie wrote:No it wasn't a stupid suggestion . It is something that should and will likely be considered . You are too thick to look at the long term and just parrot the same diatribe over and over again. I believe you sir started the name calling but I should have probably taken the high road considering your lack of reading comprehension .
Re-signing the Sedins, then buying out your franchise goalie...the two moves don't mix.
I still can't believe there are idiots who just want to get rid of Luongo from our roster for nothing.
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
You "couldn't care less".The_Pauser wrote:I could care less what would make him "tough to move." I don't see why we should be moving him at all. It's also funny how you've resorted to childish name-calling since responding to my post earlier. It was a stupid suggestion to begin with...why you heff to be mad?Blob Mckenzie wrote:No you are the mongoloid who doesn't understand how to read. The cap hit is fine tard, it's the future penalties that make him tough to move ..... Kinda like how you find it tough to understand common sense . Moron .
We should have bought him out last year.
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
The_Pauser wrote: Hey if you want to cheer for a team with no goalie go cheer for Winnipeg, or Edmonton, or Calgary. They'll tell you how good life is when you don't have a goalie.
I still can't believe there are idiots who just want to get rid of Luongo from our roster for nothing.
I still hope you are getting paid. If not, someone should be paying for your therapy.
- Todd Bersnoozi
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
Well, Kassassian has 8 goals already @ about the 40 game mark. That's a pace for like 16Gs? Not bad for a guy who pretty much plays 3rd lines minutes, plays with plumbers like Booth and Richardson mostly and zero PP time.The_Pauser wrote:That's a little crazy too. Kane is younger than Kassian, and is a proven 30 goal scorer already. Kassian hasn't even hit double digits in goals as of yet. In fact, Kassian likely doesn't even get 20 points this season.
-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:21 pm
- Location: Surrey, BC
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
No, actually trading Schneider for a solid asset while keeping Luongo (who's been better than Schneider) was the right move.dhabums wrote:You "couldn't care less".The_Pauser wrote:I could care less what would make him "tough to move." I don't see why we should be moving him at all. It's also funny how you've resorted to childish name-calling since responding to my post earlier. It was a stupid suggestion to begin with...why you heff to be mad?Blob Mckenzie wrote:No you are the mongoloid who doesn't understand how to read. The cap hit is fine tard, it's the future penalties that make him tough to move ..... Kinda like how you find it tough to understand common sense . Moron .
We should have bought him out last year.
- Chef Boi RD
- CC Legend
- Posts: 19510
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
I see a ton of sadness around here regarding the realization that Booth is not just another player destroyed by AV but in fact he really does suck! Blobby is still in denial as he is valiantly trying to shift focus from Booth to buying out Luongo and blaming Burke. LOL. Cheers Blobby Beers, why is it so hard for you to accept gillis' fuck ups? Why do you love eye bags Gillis?
DOYLE WOULD’VE RATHER HAD KEVIN HAYES AT 7 YEARS 7 MILLION PER INSTEAD OF J.T. MILLER FOR A LATE 1ST RD PICK
Re: Trades and rumours (& fantasies) 2013-14
We should have traded him for Bjugstad and a 1st, amirite? Or maybe a bevy of other young stars and picks. I guess we could have taken the 2 picks from TO.The_Pauser wrote: No, actually trading Schneider for a solid asset while keeping Luongo (who's been better than Schneider) was the right move.
You amuse me, sometimes it's all about the right now then other times it's about the future.