Vancouver Canucks Messageboard

RoyalDude wrote:It's basically this - The denial crew vs the urine crew.

Being a urinator is justifiable. Being a rose coloured spectacle wearing member of the denial crew is, well, kinda sad

Your weak bladder is really going to be an issue when your get older. "Mommy, grandpa smells funny."

RoyalDude wrote:I'm such a urinating troll for not being on board with our fearless leader - Mike 'Bold Moves' Gillis and his "it's about the process" explanation for shitting the bed with shite management skills

So untrue. You're an amusing troll because of your timing and your need to pee sitting down.

Mondi wrote:Where are the the rational defenders...let's hear the excuses for this one.

I love them.

2-0 and your mouth is shut. (well, except for breathing)

I like that we keep putting out 5 scoreless losers on our 1st PP.

Another easy 2 points.

Maybe RD is on to something with all of this. Perhaps Gillis is culpable in one area regarding our drafting..... He should have looked at all of the players the Canucks have passed on and shit-canned every scout in the organization. I'd also like to say that the loss of Luc Bourdon (RIP) makes our ...

Yeah it is amazing how atrocious this team has been managed and drafted etc over the years....hence no Stanley Cups. :( Lucky the Canucks didn't have legions of canucks fan online back in those days lol. With the 21st pick of the 1992 NHL draft, the Vancouver Canucks forgo the scouts and listen to ...

dhabums wrote: Burrows almost scores. Dalpe does. Schroeder does.

Dalpe lets me down.

Kesler passes harder than Daniel shoots.

3 Oilers, 1 Canuck, sounds like we should be shorthanded.

Is it possible that Hamhuis and Bieksa put down big money on Price to be the Olympic starter?

Eakins?

dhabums wrote: Burrows almost scores. Dalpe does. Schroeder does.

That's one down.

This game needs a wake up fight.

Hamhuis in the Olympics scares the hell out of me.