Search found 1092 matches

by DonCherry4PM
Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:11 pm
Forum: Canucks Corner Chat
Topic: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT
Replies: 1889
Views: 137058

Re: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT

^ The fact I just destroyed your point, makes that post ironic.... UND SCHTUPID!! :mex: The irony is your recognizing it is moronic to compare Juolevi to Pettersson while still thinking that comparing their size makes sense. :roll: WHOOSH I compared the size of the two as part of my destruction of ...
by DonCherry4PM
Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:30 pm
Forum: Canucks Corner Chat
Topic: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT
Replies: 1889
Views: 137058

Re: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT

Strangelove wrote:
Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:53 pm
^ The fact I just destroyed your point, makes that post ironic.... UND SCHTUPID!! :mex:
The irony is your recognizing it is moronic to compare Juolevi to Pettersson while still thinking that comparing their size makes sense. :roll:
by DonCherry4PM
Sun Jan 20, 2019 10:39 pm
Forum: Canucks Corner Chat
Topic: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT
Replies: 1889
Views: 137058

Re: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT

Skilled? NHL caliber? A good draft pick? :mex: We were talking about size, but thanks for coming out! WIN: Strangelove in Sincere apologies, Mr. Strangemod. I didn't realize I wasn't allowed to expand the boundaries of the conversation. Whoa, that was a 9.5 on the Sensitivity Scale there pal! :wow:...
by DonCherry4PM
Sun Jan 20, 2019 7:02 pm
Forum: Canucks Corner Chat
Topic: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT
Replies: 1889
Views: 137058

Re: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT

Strangelove wrote:
Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:32 pm
DonCherry4PM wrote:
Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:59 pm
Skilled?

NHL caliber?

A good draft pick?

:mex:
We were talking about size, but thanks for coming out!

WIN: Strangelove
inSincere apologies, Mr. Strangemod. I didn't realize I wasn't allowed to expand the boundaries of the conversation.
by DonCherry4PM
Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:59 pm
Forum: Canucks Corner Chat
Topic: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT
Replies: 1889
Views: 137058

Re: 2016 NHL ENTRY DRAFT

Razor thin Oli is listed at 6'3" 198lbs on hockeydb Quite right old bean, if OJ is razor thin, what is EP... https://nhl.bamcontent.com/images/photos/281967650/1024x576/cut.jpg https://images.dailyhive.com/20170624062402/elias-pettersson-canucks.png Skilled? NHL caliber? A good draft pick? :mex:
by DonCherry4PM
Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:44 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: Canucks vs Panthers 4 PM
Replies: 75
Views: 715

Re: Canucks vs Panthers 4 PM

Every. Little. Thing. :D "Subtle", not "Little". Loui with a great game. If only it happened more than a few times a season..... Good game by the boys overall. But.... that Goldy penalty was just plain lazy. You would think he would at least be trying to move his feet given the coach's temperament ...
by DonCherry4PM
Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:38 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP
Replies: 108
Views: 837

Re: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP

Yep. A bit of a stinker.
by DonCherry4PM
Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:36 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP
Replies: 108
Views: 837

Re: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP

Wasn't Granlund fast in a past life? Seems to have lost his legs entirely.
by DonCherry4PM
Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:30 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP
Replies: 108
Views: 837

Re: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP

Sven with the winner. You heard it here first.

Alternatively, the goat Goldie.
by DonCherry4PM
Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:22 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP
Replies: 108
Views: 837

Re: GDT: 10/01/19, Coyotes vs Canucks, 7:00pm, SNETP

Goldy ain't even good at what he's supposedly good at. Gaudy on the other hand... aware in all 3 zones, tenacious and now scores goals too. Perspective: PLAYER GP G A P ATOI Current Salary Goldobin 42 5 18 23 15:17 $863,333 Eriksson 45 7 9 16 14:39 $7,000,000 I realize he isn't progressing as fast ...
by DonCherry4PM
Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:23 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: GDT Jan 5 canucks vs leaves that fall cbc
Replies: 126
Views: 1523

Re: GDT Jan 5 canucks vs leaves that fall cbc

Not gonna work bro! :lol: Right. Your answering a direct question that goes to the heart of the current argument isn't going to happen. I see that. You don’t happen to work for government do you? No. IN CONTEXT (above) you completely disagreed that it's okay to want to overpay some players in a reb...
by DonCherry4PM
Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:10 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: GDT Jan 5 canucks vs leaves that fall cbc
Replies: 126
Views: 1523

Re: GDT Jan 5 canucks vs leaves that fall cbc

Sorry, no room for "slightly overpaying" in that response Mr Semantics. I see you missed my question, so I will repost for your ease of reference: So you disagree that, “'Slightly overpaying' for good mentors may in fact be getting the best bang for the buck in both the long and the short term"? I ...
by DonCherry4PM
Wed Jan 09, 2019 4:28 pm
Forum: Game Day Forum
Topic: GDT Jan 5 canucks vs leaves that fall cbc
Replies: 126
Views: 1523

Re: GDT Jan 5 canucks vs leaves that fall cbc

Yes. They are mutually exclusive, as previously noted. But by all means continue wriggling in your semantics. WIN: Strangelove :mex: So you disagree that, “'Slightly overpaying' for good mentors may in fact be getting the best bang for the buck in both the long and the short term"? I believe the im...
by DonCherry4PM
Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:44 pm
Forum: Canucks Corner Chat
Topic: OOTS 2018-2019
Replies: 212
Views: 10872

Re: OOTS 2018-2019

Blob Mckenzie wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:17 pm
Or it just proves that there’s more than one dumb GM out there.
Or more than one "Genius".
by DonCherry4PM
Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:46 pm
Forum: Canucks Corner Chat
Topic: The Official CC "All Thing Leaves" thread
Replies: 4282
Views: 304025

Re: The Official CC "All Thing Leaves" thread

There seems to be a bit of a disconnect when it comes to the evaluation of our own picks. Any that show promise are instantly proclaimed to be diamond finds by JB while others we are told to wait and see (i.e. the book hasn’t been written). Shouldn’t this standard either apply to all or none? And if...