Vancouver Canucks Messageboard

I would like to see him re-signed too, at a reasonable price.

Doctor Gohmert....... the story about Motte’s panic/anxiety issues have been out there for awhile. Maybe regale us with another Cam Neely story next time. Fuck off https://i.pinimg.com/originals/9f/68/6a/9f686a00539bb6d6d3bbb13480d6f13e.jpg In fairness, the first article he is quoting is from today.

Agree, why we would sign Lundquist for more than a year? He is also 38 and his best years are behind him, I am not against signing him for to be a 1A and mentor for Demko but I would only do it for a year.

Marky might be trying to get a NTC/NMC. (no thank you) "I'm sure Jacob Markstrom and Newport Sports is pushing for the full no-trade, no-move clause." @DarrenDreger on what he's hearing between the #Canucks and Jacob Markstrom's camp. I’m fine with that as long as it is stipulated that he can be ex...

Rags will buy him out apparently.

While Baertschi cleared waivers twice last year (maybe three times), the fact that his contract is done after this season makes considerable difference in terms of whether its movable. I would think that his performance in the AHL last year would have translated into something pretty similar to wha...

Bob McKenzie saying the Rangers asked Buffalo about Eichels availability? Hmmmm, what’s it going to take? They are desperate for another centre. The Rangers have lots of pieces Lafrenierre and D’Angelo? Lafrenierre and Shesterkin? Lafrenierre alone? Lafrenierre and K’Andre Miller? Kreider, Kravtsov...

So, hypothetically speaking, .............................would you spend next year's 1st to get 6mil in extra cap space over the next two years? Honestly, not sure I would. I would... if that was the rock bottom price. But I think Canucks can unload Loui by attaching a much smaller asset than that...

Posted this earlier, but I think the best we can hope for, other than him being a 'throw in' for a blockbuster trade is: Loui (50% retained) + 3rd round pick for future considerations (something like a 7th round pick) We loose a decent asset but get 3 mil in cap savings. That I think might be the b...

Strangelove wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 28, 2020 2:33 pm

https://www.capfriendly.com/arbitration

Canucks would not be able to walk away from an arb amount up to $4,538,958.

I don't think the team will qualify Stecher. (I think they'll trade him)

In that case, yeah, I can't see them qualify him.

Posted this earlier, but I think the best we can hope for, other than him being a 'throw in' for a blockbuster trade is: Loui (50% retained) + 3rd round pick for future considerations (something like a 7th round pick) We loose a decent asset but get 3 mil in cap savings. That I think might be the b...

Posted this earlier, but I think the best we can hope for, other than him being a 'throw in' for a blockbuster trade is: Loui (50% retained) + 3rd round pick for future considerations (something like a 7th round pick) We loose a decent asset but get 3 mil in cap savings. That I think might be the be...

Here's a question for you.

If the Canucks were going to buyout his contract, how much savings would they get? I have always heard Loui's contract is buyout proof but just how bad is it?

According to Cap Friendly the qualifying offer for Stecher is: PREVIOUS SALARY:$2,325,000 SIGNING BONUS:$0 BASE SALARY:$2,325,000 MULTIPLICATION FACTOR:100% QUALIFYING OFFER:$2,325,000 And for Jake it is: PREVIOUS SALARY:$1,500,000 SIGNING BONUS:$100,000 BASE SALARY:$1,400,000 MULTIPLICATION FACTOR...

September 28th 2020 / 17 minutes with Rick Dhaliwal on TSN 1040am. https://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040/dhaliwal-both-sides-really-want-to-get-a-markstrom-deal-done-1.1531070 Nothing imminent on the big three FAs, Tanev, Markstrom and Toffoli except he thinks the Toffoli camp will have to wait t...